Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

August 4, 2010

The Nation or The Hindu? Hard To Tell Difference Sometimes

Filed under: india,Media — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 12:48 pm

The Hindu

The Nation

The Hindu published a vicious attack on COAS Gen. Kayani this week saying that he is supporting jihadi elements, even while our troops are on the front lines of battle fighting these militants.

Ambassador Husain Haqqani has already made the point to NDTV that it is our own military – led by Gen. Kayani – that is making the greatest sacrifice to fighting extremism, and that we will not be intimidated by India in this fight.

Ambassador Haqqani: Pakistan’s Intelligence Services, Pakistan’s Military, and Pakistan’s Government have taken a very clear stand against terrorism and extremism. Over the last two years, more Pakistanis have died fighting terrorism than any other country’s military. We have already proven our sincerity in fighting terrorism through our actions. I don’t think that we will engage in a debate with anyone – an individual legislator in the United States, an individual political figure in India, or for that matter any of our individual critics in the region. Time will prove that Pakistan made a clear choice, and our choice was to rid our entire region and the world of terrorism, and we will not endure terrorist attacks in any part of the world, including in any of our neighbouring countries.

NDTV: Since a lot of what you do here in Washington as Pakistan’s Ambassador is impacted by the India-Pakistan-Afghanistan dynamic, what role do you think India can legitimately play in Afghanistan without causing Pakistan to feel buffeted in?

Ambassador Haqqani: I think that the best course for India in Afghanistan is to make sure that whatever they do there does not create misgivings in Pakistan, a little more transparency, a little more open discussion as neighbours that this is what we are about to do. It’s a part of the confidence building that we need to do to overcome the misgivings of the past. Look, we all know that there are always issues that each side can raise with one another, complaints that one can have towards one another, but if the intention is to have a stable Afghanistan, a stable Pakistan, and a stable India, playing their respective roles, working together, then I think we can find a way of reassuring each other. In Afghanistan, as long as there is no significant military intelligence activity that Pakistan finds threatening, India of course will remain a country with which the Afghans will do business, and similarly, at some point in future, Pakistan itself looks forward to a normal trade relationship with India, but until we get there, we have to have a more reassuring posture towards one another. There are things Pakistan has to take India into confidence over just to be reassuring, and similarly India has to understand that it had to do that.

Of course, it is not only The Hindu that is making such blatant attacks on our military force, but again the fifth-column in our borders called The Nation is up to its old tricks. Writing about Gen. Kayani’s extension, The Nation says it is a bad idea:

WHILE it was expected that General Kayani would get an extension, the unprecedented full three-year term extension came as a surprise, especially because it was granted by a civilian government. What was equally unprecedented was the Prime Minister announcing this extension of the COAS’s term through an address to the nation. The announcement for this address also came barely an hour before leading one to wonder why there was this haste to sew things up for General Kayani. No one can deny General Kayani’s professionalism and competency as well as his assiduous efforts to keep the military out of politics and back in the barracks in the post-Musharraf era. Having said that, the manner and timing of the extension, as well as the time period, all raise some serious issues.

Beyond these points of contention, there is the whole policy of extensions for senior civil and military bureaucrats that itself is highly contentious. Our problem in Pakistan has always been that institutional development has been thwarted by the rulers reliance on individuals rather than the institutions they serve. This renders institutional development superfluous. That in turn hinders a cohesive decision-making process to evolve and be strengthened and our policies only reflect the personal whims and preferences of individuals.

It almost sounds like the same people are writing for The Hindu and The Nation. Certainly both are against our military.

June 18, 2010

The Nation Surrenders, But REAL Pakistanis Want to FIGHT

Filed under: Media,Taliban,USA — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 6:23 am

Pakistan Army

The Taliban’s unofficial newspaper, The Nation, has written an editorial today asking the military to surrender to Taliban but REAL Pakistani Nationalists want to FIGHT.

The article in today’s The Nation is called ‘A sinister enemy’ and indeed The Nation is a sinister enemy of Pakistan for what it writes.

In this backdrop, the straight option for the Pakistan Army is to give up its penchant for US military equipment and terminate the ongoing offensive.

Can you believe it??? The Nation is demanding that Pakistan Army give up. While The Nation is writing its surrender letter to Taliban, our brave soldiers are searching for troops that these very Taliban have kidnapped and are holding prisoner. The Nation would just give them up as dead.

But REAL Pakistani Nationalists will NEVER SURRENDER to these Talibans. Look at the new poll information that is reported in Dawn:

No Muslim country surveyed recorded majority support for suicide bombing, Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. In Pakistan, only ten per cent like Taliban and only 9 per cent support Al Qaeda.

As many as seventy per cent Pakistanis have unfavourable views of the Taliban and sixty-one per cent reject Al Qaeda openly.

Actually REAL Pakistani Nationalists do not want to give up American military support for surrender to Taliban.

It is not surprising that American cooperation with the Pakistani military is popular, given the confidence that Pakistanis have in it. As many as eighty-six per cent say the military is having a good influence on the country

So why The Nation wants to surrender? Because they are Taliban lovers, not Pakistanis.

December 5, 2009

The Nation Is Out Of Touch With Reality

Filed under: Defense,Media — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 9:56 am

The Nation has really gone out of touch with reality this time, and has all but asked Pakistan to commit national suicide. Reading today’s editorials, I could only think that The Nation has decided to be disagreeable only for the habit of it.

This week has been the time of important events that mark changes in the security situation of our nation. First, US President Barack Hussein Obama announced that he will increase the number of American troops in Afghanistan for two year in effort to stabilize peace and provide greater training to Afghani police and military. Very clear in his speech was the point that Obama does not want American troops in Afghanistan for more than is necessary to improve training for Afghani military.

Second, we have seen a rise in the brazen violence by jihadis. In our own Rawalpindi, militants were so bold as to commit a suicide bomb attack against a mosque. This has prompted the editors of Dawn to say:

In these columns, we have repeatedly warned the security establishment here that any ‘good Taliban/bad Taliban’ distinction needs to be dropped for the long-term security of the country.

In Mogadishu, a suicide bomber disguised himself in women’s clothes to infiltrate a graduation ceremony. This is evidence that militants are taking a broad view in their efforts to destabilize governments, and shows that we must be on alert against these forces. The editors of Daily Times wrote today:

A suicide bomber is virtually impossible to stop once he or she embarks on the mission in hand. The only way such tactics can be scotched is if good intelligence and police work succeeds in pre-empting the mission. Reactive beefing up of security after every such incident, something we in Pakistan (and arguably elsewhere) are wedded to, and which soon falls prey to normal inertia, cannot be the answer. Good intelligence and police work implies infiltration of the extremist groups to head off plans before they mature and using an aware citizenry as the eyes and ears of the security forces. Without the involvement of the citizen of every threatened country, the security forces will remain on the back foot, hampered by the forbidding task of seeking out the potential bombers before they are launched. To slay the by now many-headed hydra of terrorism, merely military force will not do.

This is why editors of Dawn conclude that the only way forward for Pakistan is to embrace cooperation with Americans. The Americans must continue working on building trust and listening to Pakistani generals and military officers, though, as it is our commanders who have the closest knowledge of the jihadis. But without cooperation, it is everyone who loses, says Dawn.

A public and/or political backlash against expanded strikes could create further instability in the country.

And American pressure on the drone programme could affect military cooperation in other areas, further complicating counter-insurgency operations in the two countries.

Frustration and unhappiness in both the American and Pakistani camps should not overshadow a basic reality: the two sides need one another if they are to defeat the militants.

If even Dawn and Daily Times are coming to agreement about importance of improving military cooperation with the Americans, why is only The Nation saying to cut off contact with the Americans?

It is time the Pakistani state rationalised and limited its cooperation with the US and access to US institutions. Already a new form of terrorism has come to light targeting military officers and installations. The latest attack on a mosque near GHQ, used largely by the military and their families was well-planned and had similarities to the earlier attack on GHQ. These were not simply “fanatics” but well-trained and well-informed terrorists.

The Nation editors appear to have finally gone completely insane. Here they say that terrorism in Pakistan is getting worse and militants more sophisticated. And their solution? Stop working with other nations who are fighting against jihadis. Next thing to expect is The Nation asking us to commit suicide before terrorists kill us. It is the stupidest solution ever.

Pakistan’s military forces are strong and able to defend our nation. But to stop working with other nations will cut off our military from access to vital intelligence, military technology, and important partnerships that are essential to success. Is it any wonder that The Nation editorials are so out of touch since their editors did not do military service? Perhaps it is time for them to let the military do its job and stop talking about that which they know nothing.

November 10, 2009

Shireen Mazari Stabs Military In the Back

shireen-mazari-stabs-military-in-the-backShireen Mazari has finally let the cat out of the bag and exposed herself as anti-military. In today’s The Nation, the editorial suggests that because of suspicion and mistrust between the American and Pakistani militaries, Pakistan’s military should cut off it’s ties to the US military. This is a stab in the back from a member of the national media.

For all its faults, the US is a major supporter of Pakistan’s military. The Americans provide essential funding, equipment, and training to Pakistan that help our brave soldiers defend the homeland. Working closely with top military officers, President Obama has expedited delivery of new technologies to help Pakistan’s defense.

During preparations this spring for the Pakistani campaigns in Swat and South Waziristan, President Obama personally intervened at the request of Pakistan’s top army general to speed the delivery of 10 Mi-17 troop transport helicopters. Senior Pentagon officials have also hurried spare parts for Cobra helicopter gunships, night vision goggles, body armor and eavesdropping equipment to the fight.

American military surveillance drones are feeding video images and target information to Pakistani ground commanders, and the Pentagon has quietly provided the Pakistani Air Force with high-resolution, infrared sensors for F-16 warplanes, which Pakistan is using to guide bomb attacks on militants’ strongholds in South Waziristan.

In addition, the number of American Special Forces soldiers and support personnel who are training and advising Pakistani Army and paramilitary troops has doubled in the past eight months, to as many as 150, an American adviser said. The Americans do not conduct combat operations.

This military partnership is ongoing, despite attempts by some to drive a wedge between us and the Americans and leaving us isolated. Think of what this isolation would cost:

This year alone, the Pentagon is sending more than $500 million in arms, equipment and training assistance to Pakistan, to help train and equip the Pakistani military for counterinsurgency operations.

Included in that package is nearly $13 million in electronic eavesdropping equipment to intercept militants’ cellphone calls. In July, the Pentagon supplied Pakistan with 200 night vision goggles, 100 day/night scopes, more than 600 radios and 9,475 sets of body armor.

The Pentagon has also sharply increased programs to bring Pakistani officers to the United States for training, particularly in counterterrorism.

So why is Shireen Mazari suggesting that the military distance itself from the US!?! Today’s editorial says, “It is time to create a distance between the Pakistan and US militaries.”

Let’s think about what this would mean in practical defense terms. If Shireen Mazari had her way, our military would not have:

  • New Mi-17 helicopters
  • New F-16 warplanes
  • Cobra helicopter gunship parts
  • Night vision goggles
  • Body armor to protect our soldiers
  • Eavesdropping equipment to gather intelligence
  • Hi-resolution infrared sensors for F-16 warplanes
  • Training by the world’s superpower
  • $500 million in arms
  • Hundreds of day/night scopes
  • Hundreds of radios

This is only part of the equipment and training provided to Pakistan by the US military. What do you think India would do if we took Shireen Mazari’s advice and cut off our military supplies? Probably declare a national holiday! To turn our backs on this assistance would be to sign our own suicide note.

Surely there is ample suspicion and distrust between Paksitan and the US. But notice that this is never the result of military officials. It is almost never even the result of political officials! No, what causes this suspicion and mistrust is the uninformed writings of questionable characters like Shireen Mazari. Who is she working for, we ask! Certainly not for a strong Pakistan.

Rather than turning our backs on the world’s superpower and cutting off essential sources of advanced military equipment and training, Gen. Kiyani and the military officials should be working to foster closer ties with the American military officers and breaking down barriers of mistrust. Once our military pushes aside those who stand in our way (Shireen Mazari) and develops a partnership of mutual trust with the American military, no one will dare to threaten our nation.

Powered by WordPress