Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

June 3, 2011

Support Our Troops

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 11:20 am

Pakistan Soldiers

We place idols on pedestals only to throw them down and bludgeon them when they reveal feet of clay. Our relationship with our armed forces is one of false expectations, which lead us to extremes: from belting out patriotic, tear-jerking war songs to resorting to rabid calls to “dissolve the whole bloody Army.”

Tribute groups sprang up on Facebook for soldiers like Lt. Yasir Abbas, one of 10 who died in the PNS Mehran attack on May 22 in Karachi. This at the same time that mainstream media ran reports suggesting that the attackers may have been helped by military insiders. So what is the true face of the Pakistan military? Is it the image of the young, heroic soldier bidding farewell to his family as he embarks on his final mission or is it the caricature of the opportunistic, mustache-twirling general? Are these men the bastions of Jinnah’s Pakistan or Taliban sympathizers? And the numbers, which ones do we quote? The figures which show that more Pakistani soldiers have paid for America’s “war on terror” with their lives than any other army or the reportedly unaccounted for billions of dollars that have been funneled to our military since 9/11?

These conflicting accounts reflect a world of parallel realities that Pakistanis have become accustomed to. Our love-hate relationship with the military leads us, at best, to blindly extol the virtues of the armed forces, and, at its worst, to the hateful sneering we see today. It was in response to these attitudes that a group of us developed the Green Ribbon Campaign at the time of the Swat Operation two years ago. We had a simple message: It is possible to support our troops, the young who fall in the line of duty, without unquestioningly supporting those they take their orders from.

Inspired by the yellow ribbon used by the Americans to support their troops, the green ribbon with the white tip was designed to represent the tolerant and pluralistic Pakistan envisioned by Jinnah. As I wrote in “Where is Our Yellow Ribbon?” in the May 9, 2009, edition of Daily Times, “One can be angry with Zardari, think that Musharraf sold out and believe that the ISI is a sinister organization with its own agenda without losing compassion for our soldiers, the young men who are being killed every day. These are men who willingly lay down their lives, men who often return maimed or paralyzed to their young families. In other countries, men like them would enjoy hero status. And yet, here in Pakistan, when they turn on their television sets at night, they see their nation scoffing at them.”

After reading this article, a soldier who had served in the Army for 14 years wrote to me and described the toll his professional life had taken on his family and him: he suffered from chronic mountain sickness, high blood pressure and loss of memory for years after having been stationed in high altitudes. His daughter suffered academically from having to move so often and his wife lost a child because she was unable to get the little girl to the hospital in time. Still, he was willing to go back and serve his country.

Like the rest of the Army boys, this man was no saint and no sinner. He does not deserve to be idolized or demonized. And yet, as civilians, these are the only two categories we have been able to come up with. At best, we defend the Army blindly—like some of our rightwing media anchors who reduce everything to a Zionist conspiracy—and thus absolve it of any accountability. At worst, we judge the entire institution by the misdeeds of the top brass. Both are dangerous precedents.

Without losing compassion and sympathy for those who suffer and sacrifice in order to protect us, it is time for reform. The Army needs to be seen for what it is; its leaders, with all their limitations, for who they are. No deifying, please. We have all heard the stories about Pakistani fighter jets being flown by angels during the 1965 war, after the pilots ejected. It’s time to get real. Romanticizing will not help.

Ayeda Husain Naqvi is a former features editor of The Friday Times. Source: Newsweek Pakistan

August 27, 2010

US General praises Pakistan military support

Source: Pakistan Daily

The Pakistani military has shown tremendous cooperation, support, and friendship toward U.S. forces providing flood relief in northern Pakistan, the U.S. general in charge of troops there said.

“The collaboration, the cooperation, the support, the protection, and the friendship and I use that word very deliberately extended to us by our Pakistani partners has been nothing but impressive,” Army Brig. Gen. Michael Nagata told Pentagon reporters during a video -teleconference.

“This is one of the best examples of combined collaborations among military partners that I’ve ever seen,” Nagata said.

(more…)

April 14, 2010

REAL Pakistanis getting rid of Taliban traitors

Filed under: Taliban — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 5:53 pm
REAL Pakistanis taking care of Taliban scum

REAL Pakistanis getting rid of Taliban traitors

CAMP WILDERNESS, Afghanistan: Pakistani offensives against Taliban bastions have stemmed the flow of fighters into Afghanistan, according to a US general, but local officials want further action.

Pakistan last year embarked on a series of ambitious offensives to evict the Taliban from their rugged and isolated northwest sanctuaries.

The army went after fighters who swept through the Swat valley perilously close to the capital, moving on to Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan heartland South Waziristan and other tribal districts that hug the Afghan border.

“I think overall the effects that we see is that it is putting a strain on our common enemy,” said Major General Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of Nato’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in eastern Afghanistan.

“Now it’s actually fighting in two directions… We know that they are having more difficulty with their supplies, their finances, their leadership.”

The US general told AFP on a visit to ISAF’s Camp Wilderness, deep in the mountains of eastern Paktya province, that Pakistan’s military push was most effective when coupled with Nato action over the border.

“There was a period of time in summer where the cross-border activity was actually lower than it had been in the last two years,” he said.

“So, yes, you can see the effects of it. It has decreased the cross border activity for the period of time that we are working together.”

Militant training camps and safehouses in Pakistan’s semi-autonomous tribal belt mushroomed after the US-led invasion of Afghanistan sent Afghan Taliban, Al-Qaeda and other Islamist fighters flooding into the region in late 2001.

But critics say Islamabad is picking and choosing which groups to pursue, with little effect on the nearly nine-year Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan.

“Those operations are not effective for Afghanistan,” said Abdul Qayum Katawazy, governor of Afghanistan’s Paktika province, which borders North and South Waziristan and southwest Baluchistan in Pakistan.

“The Pakistani military are fighting those Taliban that are against the Pakistan government,” said Katawazy.

They do not want to fight militants who are against the Afghan government and coalition forces but who do not oppose the Pakistani authorities, he added.

Brigadier General Mohammad Asrar Aqdas, commander of the Afghan army in Khost province, which borders Pakistan’s North Waziristan and Khurram tribal districts, praised the operations but said he also saw few benefits.

“We haven’t felt any positive effect from the operations yet. This operation was not in all of Waziristan and all the insurgent camps,” he said.

Washington has criticised Islamabad for targeting only the militants that attack within Pakistan while taking a softer stance on groups using their territory to target foreign soldiers over the border.

Pakistani officials bristle at any suggestion that they are not doing enough, when thousands of soldiers and civilians have been killed in the military assaults and Taliban attacks.

While the blame game rages on, US military officials say fighters continue to move back and forth over the two countries’ porous border, either to attack foreign troops or travel on elsewhere.

US troops stationed at Camp Deysie just south of Camp Wilderness – a key militant infiltration route from Pakistan to the big Afghan cities – are preparing for more attacks as winter snows melt on the frontier mountains.

In the nearby Ibrahim Khel village, locals are deeply wary of their neighbour’s intentions, fuelled by decades of conflict and mistrust.

“If the military of Pakistan want to remove the Taliban, they can do it in one month, but they don’t want to do that,” said the hamlet’s education director, Jawaz Khan.

Source: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/world/03-pakistan-anti-taliban-push-effective-us-officials-ss-02

February 15, 2010

Militants Using False Flag Attacks

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 7:59 am

The Nation is reporting today that militants have been using “false flag” attacks to defame the name of the military. “False flag” attacks are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own.

The terrorists camouflaged in military uniform have started harassing residents in Swat and its adjacent areas to defame Pakistan army.

According to military sources, such incident happened in village Akla, 5 kilometer North West of District Shangla where terrorists in uniform with covered faces stormed in house of Haji Mohammad on February 13. Haji Mohammad opened fire on terrorists and forced them to fell, sources said. People living in villages and town of Shangla, Swat and Malakand have already been told by military authorities to be aware of impersonators, sources added. The reason behind the terrorists’ activities is to defame image of Pakistan army, sources maintained.

Do not fall for this type of psychological war. Terrorists are taking on the uniform of military to make a bad name for the military soldiers by committing bad acts.

December 24, 2009

Adm. Mullen: Pakistani Military Achievements 'Remarkable'

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 7:26 am

 

Gen. Kayani and American Adm. Mullen

Gen. Kayani and American Adm. Mullen

The American military chief has continued his praise for Paksitan’s military this week, saying that our military’s achievements were ‘remarkable’ and that our military does not get enough praise for the hard work and successes that we have accomplished.

Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has said that Pakistan does not get enough credit for its role in the war against extremists although some of its achievements were ‘pretty extraordinary’.

The American military chief also had words for those who criticise Pakistan’s fight against militants, perhaps sending a reminder to those who are prone to say that we should ‘do more’ that what we are doing is quite extraordinary already.

‘Too many people eagerly and easily criticise Pakistan for what they haven’t done, and when I go to Swat and look at what they did there on the military side I think it’s pretty extraordinary,’ said the US military chief while talking to journalists on Sunday.

A report released on Monday by the American Forces Press Service, noted that last week Pakistani authorities arranged for Admiral Mullen to visit Swat and showed him the areas they had retaken from the Taliban.

‘Swat was in danger, and the Taliban began moving even closer to the Pakistani capital. Admiral Mullen’s visit there showed that the Pakistani military has done a good job of counter-insurgency. The army cleared the valley and is holding it,’ the report noted.

It quoted Admiral Mullen as saying that while Pakistan’s job in Swat was not complete yet, what Pakistanis had achieved so far was remarkable.

The report in Dawn went on to describe the friendly relationship between the American military command and Pakistan’s military. This is above all a natural result of the partnership and close ties that our military has enjoyed with the Americans, as well as the current security situation in which we are fighting a common enemy that is the jihadi militants.

The report noted that more than most US officials, Admiral Mullen had a cordial and long-standing relationship with the Pakistani military.

The report pointed out that Admiral Mullen ‘advises patience and humility’ in dealing with Pakistan, a view not shared by some leading Republicans in Congress.

Separately, the Pentagon reported that Admiral Mullen signed guidelines for the US military for 2010, which goes to members of the Joint Staff and informs the joint force.

Al-Qaeda and similar terrorist groups remained the biggest threat to the United States, the admiral wrote in the guidance. ‘The threat is still real,’ he said. Defeating those groups will take more than military power, and the admiral called on the US military to work with other national agencies and international allies to take on the threat.

President Obama’s strategy has the goal of defeating Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan and to prevent the group from threatening America and its allies, he noted.

‘Our main effort now must be to push forces into the theatre as quickly as possible – including shifting the balance of enablers from Iraq,’ the admiral wrote. The enablers include such things as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets, engineers, military police and civil affairs personnel.

All aspects of the joint force needed to act more quickly, he said, urging the Defence Department and the combatant commands to send their very best people to fight the wars.

December 18, 2009

Adm. Mullen Praises Pakistan Army's War Plan

Filed under: Defense,USA — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 12:36 pm
Gen. Kayani with American Military Chief Adm. Mullen

Gen. Kayani with American Military Chief Adm. Mullen

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen said he “couldn’t give the Pakistani Army anything but an ‘A’” for how they’ve conducted their battle so far, after eight-months-plus of fighting to clear militants from the Swat Valley. He was speaking to those of us traveling with him, after he spent the day touring the now-conquered Swat Valley with Pakistan’s Chief of Staff General Ashfaq Kayani . (For the record, after so many visits with U.S. and Pakistani military officials and diplomats in Afghanistan and Pakistan over the last few days, he looked worn. But so did we.)

“He planned well, and he’s been very deliberate about how much he can get done and when he can get it done,” Mullen said. “I think that’s a very realistic approach to the operations.”

He said that includes how the Pakistani military is currently conducting their counterinsurgency campaign there—trying to boost economic and political development there, after taking that territory. That’s a new way of fighting for the Pakistani army, and one many U.S. military analysts and officers had publicly doubted they could pull off.

Mullen’s comments are also unexpectedly high praise from American’s top military commander in uniform — at a time when U.S. officials are often quoted in the media saying Pakistan is not doing enough to fight the Afghan Taliban, which threatens U.S. troops across the border in Afghanistan. The Pakistani army continues to fight the militants, but they’re concentrating on the Pakistani Taliban, who have waged a deadly suicide bombing campaign in their country, and bypassed areas populated by some of America’s enemies.

You could cynically say Mullen’s warm comments are good preparation to soften the Pakistani leadership up, before asking them to do more. But Mullen is a known for being more matter of fact than manipulative. And he’s not known for being overzealous in handing out praise.

His staff explained he really thinks the Pakistani army in general, and Kayani in particular “get it.” “They’re a learning force,” one official said. They learned the hard way, by taking hundreds of casualties early in this campaign, and finding out that if you don’t hold territory after you take it from the Taliban, you just have to take it again, and lose more troops in the process.

And as the U.S. military learned in Iraq, the official explained, they’ve also learned that it’s easier to “clear and hold” the first part of counterinsurgency, than it is to “build and transfer”—as in building hospitals, schools, roads, and bringing in jobs and business, and then transferring the area to a stable government and security force.

Admiral Mullen said it’s something Kayani and his military commanders brought up a lot in their tour today – that while they’d conquered much of the territory they’d gone after, the economic aid and support from their own government and the international community wasn’t coming in fast enough to both get people back to work, and keep them satisfied enough to keep them from supporting the Taliban again.

“That’s something he is concerned about,” Mullen said. “He has got to hold this territory, until the building starts. So that’s where his main focus is.”

Mullen is taking that message back to Washington – what is essentially a polite pushback from the Pakistani military that they are fighting as hard as they can, as fast as they can, but they’re taking care of their own business, and their own direct enemies – the militant groups responsible for a string of bloody bombings across Pakistan—before they go after America’s enemies.

That said, the admiral said he did bring up Washington’s desire that Pakistan pursue the Afghan Taliban, aka Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar and crew, thought to be sheltering in Pakistan, as well and the militant Haqqani tribe, which straddles Afghanistan and the Pakistani territory of Northern Waziristan. Mullen said Kayani “gets” that too.

“He is very aware of the additional insurgents that are out there, and he is likewise focused in getting at them,” Mullen said. “I say that broadly. That’s without exactly how that’s going to be done or when that’s going to be done.”

And that sounds to this reporter like two military commanders getting together and saying to each other, we know what needs to happen, and we also know how fast the politicians want it to happen. But we also both know that from a military standpoint, it doesn’t happen that fast on the ground.

Call it a diplomatic version of “back off, and let us do our job.” But you won’t hear a general, or an admiral, saying that to a reporter out loud.

Powered by WordPress