Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

October 20, 2010

USA To Increase Military Aid for Pakistan

Pakistan military equipped with US supplies

According to the American newspaper Wall Street Journal, the President Barack Hussain Obama is planning to increase military support for Pak Army.

The Obama administration is planning to ramp up military support to the Pakistani army as part of an effort to persuade Islamabad to do far more to combat Islamic militants.

According to the news report, this support will be more than USD$2 Billions (Rs.172 Billions) in military equipment.

The new military aid, which is contingent on congressional approval, is expected to amount to more than $2 billion over five years, would pay for equipment Pakistan can use for counterinsurgency and counterterror operations. U.S. officials say they hope the new aid could effectively eliminate Pakistan’s objections that it doesn’t have the equipment needed to launch more operations in tribal areas.

Department of Defense officials, including Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will meet on Wednesday with Pakistani Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ashfaq Kayani at the Pentagon.

With the military stretched thin by dealing with flood relief, militants, and Indian aggression, this is a vital support to our national defense.

This also flies in the face of the false hypernationalists like Shireen Mazari who says that Pakistan should cut funding for Pakistan’s military and reject strategic relationships to US military. If Shireen Mazari and her kind had their way, Pakistan would be immediately vulnerable to Indian attacks! By strengthening our partnership with the USA we are able to improve our national defense by getting more military equipment and showing the Indian aggressors that WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED.

August 27, 2010

US General praises Pakistan military support

Source: Pakistan Daily

The Pakistani military has shown tremendous cooperation, support, and friendship toward U.S. forces providing flood relief in northern Pakistan, the U.S. general in charge of troops there said.

“The collaboration, the cooperation, the support, the protection, and the friendship and I use that word very deliberately extended to us by our Pakistani partners has been nothing but impressive,” Army Brig. Gen. Michael Nagata told Pentagon reporters during a video -teleconference.

“This is one of the best examples of combined collaborations among military partners that I’ve ever seen,” Nagata said.

(more…)

June 18, 2010

The Nation Surrenders, But REAL Pakistanis Want to FIGHT

Filed under: Media,Taliban,USA — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 6:23 am

Pakistan Army

The Taliban’s unofficial newspaper, The Nation, has written an editorial today asking the military to surrender to Taliban but REAL Pakistani Nationalists want to FIGHT.

The article in today’s The Nation is called ‘A sinister enemy’ and indeed The Nation is a sinister enemy of Pakistan for what it writes.

In this backdrop, the straight option for the Pakistan Army is to give up its penchant for US military equipment and terminate the ongoing offensive.

Can you believe it??? The Nation is demanding that Pakistan Army give up. While The Nation is writing its surrender letter to Taliban, our brave soldiers are searching for troops that these very Taliban have kidnapped and are holding prisoner. The Nation would just give them up as dead.

But REAL Pakistani Nationalists will NEVER SURRENDER to these Talibans. Look at the new poll information that is reported in Dawn:

No Muslim country surveyed recorded majority support for suicide bombing, Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. In Pakistan, only ten per cent like Taliban and only 9 per cent support Al Qaeda.

As many as seventy per cent Pakistanis have unfavourable views of the Taliban and sixty-one per cent reject Al Qaeda openly.

Actually REAL Pakistani Nationalists do not want to give up American military support for surrender to Taliban.

It is not surprising that American cooperation with the Pakistani military is popular, given the confidence that Pakistanis have in it. As many as eighty-six per cent say the military is having a good influence on the country

So why The Nation wants to surrender? Because they are Taliban lovers, not Pakistanis.

May 7, 2010

India Cries to America: Please Don't Give Pak Army Aid!

Filed under: Defense,india — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 7:00 am

If you needed further proof that Pak-American military cooperation is good for Pakistan, you only have to listen to the whining from the East. Now India Defence Minister A.K. Antony is begging US not to be such a good friend to Pakistan’s armed forces.

India’s defence minister cautioned the United States on Friday against military supplies to Pakistan, saying the hardware could be diverted to target India.The warning came after the US in March said it would deliver unarmed drones to Pakistan and less than a month after it unveiled plans to transfer 600 million dollars to Islamabad to pay for anti-militant operations.

A. K. Antony told reporters in New Delhi that India’s concerns had been conveyed to Washington.

What more proof do you need that the Pak-US partnership is for our own good? Our men are doing a v.v. excellent job fighting the jihadi menace while still keeping our Eastern border secure. By building a close and trustworthy relationship with the Americans and obtaining upgraded equipment greater military cooperation even for conventional defence, our forces have been able to display the military might of Pakistan. Ahmad Mukhtar, Ashfaq Kayani, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, and Husain Haqqani have done a great job. You can read it on the Indians faces!

Sreesanth Crying

May 3, 2010

US turns Focus to Pakistan's Conventional Defence

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 10:58 am

This is great news, and shows that the Americans are really coming around and seeing that they have a strategic advantage in building close ties with Pakistan outside the confines of fighting Taliban. This is a mistake that is often repeated – that the Americans will leave Pakistan defenceless once they are through with the war in Afghanistan. This has happened before, so we have good reason to question if they will stay. I do not deny this. But there are many signs that they Americans are not going to abandon Pakistan again. First is the investment in civilian items like energy. Also there is the transfer of military technologies. Now, they Americans are saying openly that they have a priority that is ensuring Pakistan’s conventional defence against attempts to attack not by terrorists but by antagonists such as India perhaps.

WASHINGTON: The United States appears to have realised the importance of strengthening Pakistan’s conventional defence while also enhancing its capability to fight extremists.

In doing so, senior US officials also recognised Pakistan’s concerns about India and conceded that Washington’s growing ties with New Delhi were a cause of concern for Islamabad.

“We must continue to reassure Pakistan that as it combats the terrorist threat, it is not exposing itself to increased risk along its eastern border,” said Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Michele Flournoy while explaining why the United States needed to strengthen Islamabad’s conventional defence systems as well.

“Although extremist attacks have led to the repositioning of substantial Pakistani forces, Pakistan’s strategic concerns about India remain pre-eminent.”

Under Secretary Flournoy and other senior US officials who spoke to the House Armed Services Committee urged lawmakers to provide funding for billions of dollars of planned US military and civilian aid to Pakistan during the next five years.

Separately, another senior Pentagon official told journalists in Washington that the sale of F-16 aircraft to Pakistan later this year would be “a sign of this burgeoning relationship between us and increased defence cooperation between our two countries.”

In a related development, senior US State and Defence officials said the United States planned to provide $1.5 billion to Pakistan by September 2011 for buying military equipment.

During the same period, the United States also plans to reimburse about $2.3 billion Pakistan spent while fighting terrorists along the Afghan border. Of these, $600 million will be quickly transferred to Pakistan while the rest will be reimbursed by September 2011, when the current US fiscal year ends.

Besides providing military equipment, the United States also has accepted Pakistan’s position that it has genuine interests in Afghanistan and those interests need to be protected.

Meanwhile, the US media reports that the United States and Pakistan are establishing a joint military intelligence centre inside Pakistan.

The United States is also sending 50 aircraft technicians to Pakistan with four new F-16s it plans to hand over to Islamabad in June.

By September 2011, Pakistan will receive a total of 18 of these planes. A US military team will accompany these aircraft “to ensure that sophisticated, top-of-the-line avionics, weapons and data systems aboard the aircraft remain secure,” The Washington Post reported.

The planes, which for the first time will allow Pakistan to conduct night-time air operations, are far more advanced than the 30-year-old US aircraft that are the current mainstay of the Pakistan Air Force.

Currently, there are about 200 US military instructors in Pakistan, including 140 from a Special Operations training and advisory contingent.

The CIA also has sent additional intelligence-gathering operatives and technicians in recent months and plans are under way to establish a joint military intelligence processing centre in Pakistan.

Under Secretary Flournoy said the plans to help Pakistan strengthen its defence “remain vital to our overall goal of disrupting, dismantling and defeating Al Qaeda and to enhancing stability in a critical region”.

Key US lawmakers also back the new Pakistan policy, and have urged action to further increase educational opportunities for Pakistani military officers at US military schools, and faster movement to provide Pakistan with key military hardware, particularly helicopters.

Source: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/19-us-turns-focus-to-pakistans-conventional-defence-250-hh-04

April 21, 2010

Pakistan To Receive Guided-Missile Frigate From USA

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , — admin @ 9:51 am

Guided-Missile FrigatePakistan and United States signed a contract for the transfer of the guided-missile frigate USS McInerney here on Tuesday.

The contract will enable Pakistan to take over the USS McInerney at the US Naval station Mayport, Florida on August 31 this year, after which it will be commissioned as PNS Alamgir .A comprehensive refurbishment of the ship will be undertaken under the supervision of US Navy, which will be completed by January 2011.

Defence Procurement Attache Captain Abdur Rehman inked the contract on behalf of Pakistan Navy. The successful culmination of this contract will also pave way for acquisition of more vessels of same class for the Pakistan Navy to raise a squadron of eight Perry-Class frigates. This will greatly enhance operational readiness of Pakistan Navy.

USS McInerney is the second ship of the Oliver Hazard Perry-Class of guided-missile frigates. In September 2008, the US Congress had approved provision of the frigate to Pakistan with a delivery date of August 2010. Citing the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act, Pakistan is considered a major non-Nato ally and is able to receive older unneeded US military equipment. Additionally, the 32-year-old frigate will be given a $ 65 million refurbishment, including anti-submarine capability paid for with foreign military aid provided by the US to the friendly countries. Pakistan will pay $78 million for the frigate

Source: http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=28417

March 26, 2010

Pak-US Talks Anger India

Filed under: india — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:44 am
American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Meets With FM Qureshi

American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Meets With FM Qureshi

If there was ever any question about whether or not Pak-US relations are good for Pakistan, the correct answer has come from India. While the talks are going on in Washington, India is getting nervous about the relationship building between Pakistan and America.

Indian strategic community believes Pakistan and the US may have come up with a hush-hush understanding on Afghanistan in the ongoing strategic dialogue, aimed at marginalising Indian role in Afghanistan.

This is what we have been writing about on this blog when we say that the people like Ahmed Quraishi and Zaid Hamid and Shireen Mazari who are always trying to end any friendship with the Americans are intentionally or unintentionally playing into the hands of India.

What better proof can there be than the fact that once the Indians see Pakistan and American becoming closer, they start to get scared? Why? Because they know that a strong bond between Pakistan and America will crush any of their dreams of undermining Pakistan. Because they know that this bond will mean that Pakistan’s military will have access to the best and most sophisticated military equipment to ensure that there are no threats to our sovereignty and our borders.

Do you not believe me? Simply read the words of Indian officials:

Former Indian foreign secretary Lalit Mansingh asked the Indian government not to be complacent over the US refusal to sign a nuclear deal with Pakistan. He called for focusing on the future of Afghanistan and India’s relationship with the central Asia.

Fighting: Mansingh said the nuclear-capable F-16s and maritime aircraft supplied by the US to Pakistan were not to fight terrorism, but to fight India.

Experts believe that the situation emerging in Afghanistan was a matter of concern for India and any deal with the Taliban would affect its interests. Former deputy national security adviser Satish Chandra said Pakistan had been given a veto over the future of Afghanistan, which was a big setback for India. “Pakistan wants to become the sole spokesperson of the Taliban. Pakistan has eliminated all potential mediators between the Taliban and the US so as to be the sole mediator with the Taliban,” said Alok Bansal, deputy director at the National Maritime Foundation (NMF).

Meanwhile, India’s main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) took exception to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying, “Pakistan’s struggles are my struggles”, asking if America was a party to anti-India terror activities emanating from Islamabad. “Clinton’s statement at a meeting with Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi amazingly belies an utter disregard for facts and history,” BJP spokesman Tarun Vijay said. He criticised the US for denying India access to David Headley, the American who confessed in a US court of plotting the Mumbai terror attack. “Instead of strengthening a dictatorial power centre supported and bolstered by the Pakistan Army, the US would have done better by asking Pakistan’s leaders to be actively helping India in its war on terror,” he said.

These talks in Washington are a blessing from Allah who has seen fit to give Pakistan an ally in the world’s two superpowers America and China. When India is kicking and screaming, you know that it must be the work of almighty Allah.

March 25, 2010

US to speed up arms supply

USA Pakistan Dialogue

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday US pledged a $125 million aid to boost the energy sector in Pakistan, besides allowing Pakistani products access to US markets and speeding up military equipment transfers, Geo News reported.

In a joint press briefing with Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi here after holding the strategic dialogue with the Pakistani delegation, she termed the strategic sitting important not only for Pakistan but also for the US administration.

She pledged American assistance to develop the agriculture sector in Pakistan besides extending assistance to maximise the exports of Pakistan. ‘Pakistani products will now have access to US markets,’ she said, adding that the US would provide cooperation in the establishment of three thermal power plants to lessen the power crisis in Pakistan. The US would also help Pakistan expand the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), she said.

Clinton said that the US would sign a letter for ‘significant road infrastructure’ in Pakistan’s troubled northwest without offering a figure. ‘Pakistan is on the frontline of confronting violent extremism that threatens us all, and Pakistan’s civilian and security forces continue to bear the brunt of that fight,’ Clinton said.

Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that US suspicions of his country have evaporated, with officials no longer questioning Islamabad’s commitment to fight extremism. Qureshi, who was holding a first-of-a-kind ‘strategic dialogue’ with the United States, said ‘the mood was completely different’ from previous visits to Washington.

‘I was at the Senate; I was at the House. It’s a 180-degree difference,’ he told a joint news conference with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. ‘There were no more question marks, there was no suspicion, there was no ‘do more,” he said. ‘There was appreciation for what we had already done.’

‘We’ve agreed to fast-track our requests, that have been pending for months and years, on the transfer of military equipment to Pakistan,’ Qureshi told said. Hillary Clinton, earlier in the dialogue, said that the US supported dialogue between India and Pakistan, while Shah Mehmood Qureshi called for a ‘constructive engagement’ by the United States on Kashmir.

Asked about Qureshi’s remarks later at the joint news conference, Clinton said that the US supported reconciliation efforts between India and Pakistan. ‘The issues that are part of that dialogue need to be addressed and resolution of them between the two countries would certainly be in everyone’s best interest,’ she said, without explicitly mentioning Kashmir.

Clinton said that the United States wanted to be a partner of Pakistan on ‘a full range of matters.’ ‘We can’t dictate Pakistani foreign policy or Indian foreign policy. But we can encourage, as we do, the in-depth discussion between both countries that we think would benefit each of them with respect to security and development,’ she said.

Speaking at an early-morning ceremony, Hillary Clinton said the US had started a ‘new day’ with Pakistan in hearing its concerns. Clinton said she wanted to speak directly to its people, acknowledging that the two nations ‘have had our misunderstandings and disagreements in the past.’

‘There are sure to be more disagreements in the future, as there are between any friends or, frankly, any family members,’ she said. ‘But this is a new day. For the past year, the Obama administration has shown in our words and deeds a different approach and attitude toward Pakistan.’

‘The dialogue we seek is not only with the government of Pakistan, but you the people of Pakistan,’ she said, vowing that both she and President Barack Obama had a ‘personal commitment’ to building ties with Islamabad.

Clinton said stability of Pakistan was in the world’s interest. Pointing to Pakistan’s growing action against extremism, she pledged full support, saying, ‘Its struggles are our struggles.’ Reiterating US support in the fight against terror to the nation, she affirmed that the Taliban were trying to consolidate in Pakistan, and it would be a threat for humanity as well as for the region.

She said that the Taliban wanted to destabilise Pakistan, and ‘we have to work together for their complete eradication.’ She said that the both nations are looking for a successful composite dialogue, as it would not be a one time dialogue.

She also lauded the role of Pakistan towards the establishment of peace in South Asia and termed the security and stability of Pakistan a top priority. ‘Pakistan’s military has mounted successful military operations against terrorists. Pakistan’s security agencies have captured many notorious al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorists,’ she said.

She made it clear that during the conversation, the United States will address Pakistan’s energy needs for the citizens of the nation. Clinton said that the stability and security of Pakistan was important for the world and the US would continue its maximum help to strengthen Pakistan.

She said, ‘We know that Pakistan is facing a severe problem due to the energy shortage in the country. And we will not let Pakistan alone in these intermingled problems and the US would always be on the side of Pakistan in its hour of need. The people are facing severe blackouts due to unavailability of electricity. Farmers are worried about the future of the agriculture sector due to the shortage of water in the country.’

Qureshi expressed gratitude for US assistance and pledged that Pakistan would keep up the fight against extremism. But he made it clear that Pakistan wanted benefits in return. Qureshi said that Pakistan was seeking ‘non-discriminatory’ access to energy resources as well as a ‘constructive’ role by the United States on its dispute with India over Kashmir. ‘Such a partnership, we are convinced, is good for Pakistan, good for America and good for international peace, security and prosperity,’ he said.

‘Pakistan is committed to doing its part to facilitate the world community’s effort for peace and stability in Afghanistan,’ Qureshi said. ‘We hope the world community will be equally responsive to our legitimate concerns and help advance common interests,’ he said.

He said the war against terrorism had seriously damaged Pakistan’s economy, as Pakistan has got nothing but bomb blasts in response to waging war against terrorism. Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar, US defence Secretary Robert Gates and Pakistan Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani and Chairman Joint Chiefs Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, senior advisers and officials attended the dialogue.

News Desk adds: The US has also agreed to pay Pakistan its military spending in anti-terror operations in two installments.

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=27958

March 11, 2010

Afghanistan Pakistan Partnership

Filed under: Afghanistan — Tags: , , , — admin @ 10:44 am

Zardari and Karzai

President Asif Ali Zardari on Wednesday said Pakistan and Afghanistan should stand together and persuade the international community to devise a Marshal Plan for the region to get rid of militancy and its effects.

“The two countries need to speak the same language at international forums because both suffer from the same malaise caused by the same mindset of militancy and extremism,” the president said while talking to Afghan President Hamid Karzai at the bilateral talks. The Afghan delegation, led by Hamid Karzai, included Foreign Minister Zalmai Rassoul, National Security Adviser Dr Rangin Dafdar Spanta, Education Minister Dr Farooq Wardak and charge d’affaires Majnoon Gulab.

President Zardari led the Pakistani delegation comprising Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood

Qureshi, Defence Minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar, Interior Minister Rehman Malik, Hina Rabbani Khar, Secretary General to the President Salman Faruqui and president’s spokesman Farhatullah Babar.

President Zardari said there may be some minor variations in the medication needed by Pakistan and Afghanistan to meet the challenges of militancy but the root-cause of the malaise being the same, the two countries needed to be on the same page, speak the same language and demand assistance from the international community with the same vigour and intensity, president’s spokesman said.

President Zardari also suggested that foreign ministers of the two countries should sit together and work out modalities in this regard. Farhatullah Babar said President Zardari also endorsed the suggestion of his Afghan counterpart to convene a meeting of the Pak-Afghan Peace Jirga after the Afghan Peace Jirga held its deliberations.

The president said the Pak-Afghan Peace Jirga will help take forward the process of friendship. “Every step that can be taken must be taken to address our common issues,” Zardari said with reference to the proposed meeting of the Pak-Afghan Peace Jirga.

Strengthening bilateral ties and ways to address regional issues related to peace and security and jointly fighting terrorism also came under discussion. Karzai, who flew in here late afternoon on a two-day visit, arrived at the Presidency and met President Zardari soon after his arrival.

During the exclusive and delegation-level talks, President Zardari stressed for enhanced interaction between the two countries to better cope with the issues of terrorism and extremism. He said the unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Afghanistan were of great importance and termed terrorism a common challenge to Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He said Pakistan was determined to fight militancy to the end, which was a long drawn battle and there was no quick solution to this problem. President Zardari stressed the need for greater economic cooperation between the two countries and said the government was determined to correct the past mistakes to carve out a better future.

He pointed out that Pakistan’s bilateral trade with Afghanistan was $ 1.4 billion in 2008 and there was a vast economic potential and great opportunities for cooperation. He said Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement was under negotiations and hoped it would further boost the economic interaction.

Karzai urged for a partnership which allows realisation of the full potential of human and natural resources. He called for new development projects and investment in the two countries driven by energy corridors in the region. Karzai also thanked Zardari for Pakistan’s support and efforts for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Afghanistan.

March 5, 2010

American Military Chief Pledges Greater Transparency, Cooperation With Pakistan

American military commander Admiral Mike Mullen met with Pakistani Ambassador Hussain Haqqani and pledged increased transparency and cooperation with Pakistan in efforts to fight militants.

Mullen summarized remarks he made a day earlier at Kansas State University, where he said the military’s guiding principles of sharing the burden with government agencies, using a measured level of force and working with international partners is critical to resolve conflicts.

That includes taking steps to minimize civilian casualties by being transparent in operations and intent. Mullen cited ongoing operations in Marjah and the guidance issued by U.S. commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

“It’s who we are as Americans and who we have chosen to be for a long time,” Mullen said.

After his lecture, he met with Pakistan’s ambassador to the U.S., who was scheduled to speak later to the same group of officers. Mullen said the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan is critical to ongoing operations and the larger war to fight extremist groups.

Ambassador Husain Haqqani said after meeting with Mullen that recent arrests of terrorists in Pakistan were further evidence of his nation’s commitment to support U.S. efforts.

“Pakistanis believe they have been doing a lot in the war on terrorism that has not been recognized in the world,” Haqqani said. “Part of it was based on misperceptions rooted in history. Now I think it is very clear that Pakistan’s action, whether on the military front or on the terrorist front, are actions that are compatible with the international expectations.”

Mullen said the United States has to continue to work at restoring trust among the Pakistanis after strained tensions caused by sanctions placed on the nation in the 1990s.

“If you don’t trust each other we’re not going to work together well,” Mullen said.

Haqqani agreed and said the two nations were cooperating and had mutual interests in defeating the extremists, but relations will not be perfect with the United States just because of battlefield successes.

“Trust isn’t an event, it is a process,” the ambassador said.

Source

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress