Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

May 25, 2011

INDIAN SCHEME TO ISOLATE PAKISTAN BEARING FRUIT

Filed under: india — Tags: , , , , , , , — admin @ 1:12 pm

Chidambaram whispering in Clinton's ear to cut aid to PakistanThe scheme of pro-India lobby and their Trojan Horses inside Pakistan to isolate Pakistan and choke the nation is bearing fruit for the Hindu nationalists. The plans have been exposed as well the Trojan horses working inside the country to support these nefarious designs. News reports today reveal that despite being exposed these elements have managed to stay under the nation’s radar and now their plans are growing fruits.

On Friday, US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano will meet with Indian Home Minister P. Chidambaram for the first time to discuss counter-terrorism ties between two sides. India is capitalizing on the discovery of Osama bin Laden and the attack on PNS Mehran by whispering in the ear of US officials that Pakistan cannot be trusted. Even though US officials reaction to the discovery of Osama bin Laden was to admit that the operation was made possible by intelligence cooperation with Pakistan and US officials have repeatedly confirmed that no government or military officials had knowledge of bin Laden’s hideout, India is playing on American fears of a repeated 9/11 attack to be a ‘devils advocate’ against Pakistan.

Inside the country, the Indian talking points are boosted by statements by those such as Shireen Mazari and Hamid Gul for example who appear on TV to beat the drum of anti-Americanism and whip up feelings in the US that Pakistan is not an ally. It should be noted that Shireen Mazari has been saying for years to cut off funding and supplies for Pakistan’s defences. Some of India’s Trojan Horses must have been quite pleased to see the destruction of Orion planes which were essential to detecting and tracking Indian submarines.

The article in Economic Times ends by noting the statement by DG ISI Pasha warning India that any Abbottabad-like attack would invite a befitting response. Why this is included in an article about the coming US-India meeting unless India is planning to request US not to intervene to protect Pakistan in the event that they carry out such a plan? We must recall that US military training and supplies has always played a key role in enabling Pakistan to defend itself against Indian aggression.

Removing this source of defence and security resources has been a goal of India since they were rebuked by the US military chief Admiral Michael Mullen when he told Defence Minister A.K. Antony last summer that US would not turn its back on its friend Pakistan again.

Characterising U.S.-Pakistan military cooperation as being reflective of the growing relations and friendship between the two countries, Admiral Mullen said Washington was broadening its military relations with Islamabad after the ties were cut off for almost a dozen years.

This is why Indian newspapers run so many English language articles describing US aid to Pakistan as the cause of terrorism.

No sooner had U.S. President Barack Obama assumed office than he implemented a military surge in Afghanistan. In Pakistan, however, he implemented an aid surge, turning it into the largest recipient of American aid. This only deepened U.S. involvement in the wrong war and emboldened Pakistan to fatten the Afghan Taliban, even as sustained U.S. drone and other attacks in Waziristan continued to severely weaken the already-fragmented al- Qaeda.

Recent articles by India lobby admits that the goal of their plan is “to cut off aid to Pakistan’s military might”.

The US has but one interest which is to see terrorism stamped out. This is the same goal of Pakistan which has borne the greatest burden of terrorist violence including the loss at PNS Mehran, the suicide bombing against CID building in Peshawar, and the suicide bombing against police bus in Jalalabad one week ago. Each of these attacks has targeted Pakistan’s defences which are boosted with the American military aid. Therefore India knows that by cutting off this vital lifeline of security and defence cooperation between Pakistan and US, they’re plan will come to bear fruit.

So now the moment is at hand and we must ask whether we will allow ourselves to be betrayed in this manner not by the US who is rather but a confused pardesi caught in a web of Indian intrigue but the betrayal of the Trojan horses who are acting as a fifth-column and facilitating this scheme from the inside also.

October 20, 2010

USA To Increase Military Aid for Pakistan

Pakistan military equipped with US supplies

According to the American newspaper Wall Street Journal, the President Barack Hussain Obama is planning to increase military support for Pak Army.

The Obama administration is planning to ramp up military support to the Pakistani army as part of an effort to persuade Islamabad to do far more to combat Islamic militants.

According to the news report, this support will be more than USD$2 Billions (Rs.172 Billions) in military equipment.

The new military aid, which is contingent on congressional approval, is expected to amount to more than $2 billion over five years, would pay for equipment Pakistan can use for counterinsurgency and counterterror operations. U.S. officials say they hope the new aid could effectively eliminate Pakistan’s objections that it doesn’t have the equipment needed to launch more operations in tribal areas.

Department of Defense officials, including Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will meet on Wednesday with Pakistani Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ashfaq Kayani at the Pentagon.

With the military stretched thin by dealing with flood relief, militants, and Indian aggression, this is a vital support to our national defense.

This also flies in the face of the false hypernationalists like Shireen Mazari who says that Pakistan should cut funding for Pakistan’s military and reject strategic relationships to US military. If Shireen Mazari and her kind had their way, Pakistan would be immediately vulnerable to Indian attacks! By strengthening our partnership with the USA we are able to improve our national defense by getting more military equipment and showing the Indian aggressors that WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED.

November 16, 2009

Quraishi's Coup Would Destroy Pakistan

In my recent post, Quraishi’s Coup: Who is he really working for?, I noted that the recent political unrest in Honduras clearly demonstrates that the Obama regime in the US will not allow a coup in Pakistan without serious consequences. Among these consequences, quite clearly, would be the cutting off of military supplies necessary for the defense of Pakistan.

On his blog this past Saturday, Ibrahim Sajid Malick further corroborates my analysis by noting that his own sources have confirmed that supporting a coup in Pakistan will mean the devastation of Pakistan’s ability to defend itself.

United States Central Command chief Gen David Petraeus and Chairman Senate Foreign Affairs committee Senator John Kerry on Monday October 19th held separate meetings with the Pakistan Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashraf Kayani and the outcome of those meetings were an immediate yanking of the anti-KLB campaign from Pakistani private TV channels. When Central Command chief Gen David Petraeus went to the GHQ he categorically told Gen Kayani to halt anti-KLB campaign. “Gen. Kayani was told in absolutely clear terms that the Obama administration will not tolerate another Honduras,” said a source very close to this conversation.

It is interesting that three of my sources mentioned Honduras while talking about the possible outcome of anti-KLB campaign in Pakistan.

On June 28th Honduran soldiers roused democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya from his bed at gunpoint and flew him to Costa Rica. The coup d’etat was the first in Central America in over a quarter century. The coup, led by the Honduran Gen. Romeo Vasquez, was condemned by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, the Organization of American States and all of Honduras’ immediate national neighbors.

The Obama administration initially did not legally classify Zelaya’s ouster as a coup, which would automatically trigger a suspension of aid. However the administration subsequently suspended military cooperation with the country. Honduran controversy has been extremely embarrassing for the Obama administration which had come to power on the rhetoric that America should seize supporting tyrants and military dictators.

In Pakistan, Zardari administration was portrayed by the media as too deferential to the United States. Pakistani journalists who unconditionally support their Army started the campaign against KLB and coalesced anti-Western politicians, and Muslim fundamentalists — implausibly claiming that Pakistan’s sovereignty was undermined and the country could end up as a U.S. neo-colony. Some of it is untrue!

Mr. Malick’s sources go on to make my point exactly:

Gen. Kayani was assured that his military will get monies and equipment that he has asked for but if he pulled a fast one, the Obama administration would at once severe its ties with Pakistan army.

I kindly ask, once again, who it is that would benefit from such an outcome? Certainly not the US, who relies on Pakistan to help in the fight against Taliban. Certainly not Pakistan, who relies on the US to provide military funding, supplies, and training. Is there any other nation that would benefit from a Pakistan coup other than India? And by calling for such a coup, is Ahmed Quraishi acting as an Indian agent?

Who Does Ahmed Quraishi Work For?

Who Does Ahmed Quraishi Work For?

November 10, 2009

Shireen Mazari Stabs Military In the Back

shireen-mazari-stabs-military-in-the-backShireen Mazari has finally let the cat out of the bag and exposed herself as anti-military. In today’s The Nation, the editorial suggests that because of suspicion and mistrust between the American and Pakistani militaries, Pakistan’s military should cut off it’s ties to the US military. This is a stab in the back from a member of the national media.

For all its faults, the US is a major supporter of Pakistan’s military. The Americans provide essential funding, equipment, and training to Pakistan that help our brave soldiers defend the homeland. Working closely with top military officers, President Obama has expedited delivery of new technologies to help Pakistan’s defense.

During preparations this spring for the Pakistani campaigns in Swat and South Waziristan, President Obama personally intervened at the request of Pakistan’s top army general to speed the delivery of 10 Mi-17 troop transport helicopters. Senior Pentagon officials have also hurried spare parts for Cobra helicopter gunships, night vision goggles, body armor and eavesdropping equipment to the fight.

American military surveillance drones are feeding video images and target information to Pakistani ground commanders, and the Pentagon has quietly provided the Pakistani Air Force with high-resolution, infrared sensors for F-16 warplanes, which Pakistan is using to guide bomb attacks on militants’ strongholds in South Waziristan.

In addition, the number of American Special Forces soldiers and support personnel who are training and advising Pakistani Army and paramilitary troops has doubled in the past eight months, to as many as 150, an American adviser said. The Americans do not conduct combat operations.

This military partnership is ongoing, despite attempts by some to drive a wedge between us and the Americans and leaving us isolated. Think of what this isolation would cost:

This year alone, the Pentagon is sending more than $500 million in arms, equipment and training assistance to Pakistan, to help train and equip the Pakistani military for counterinsurgency operations.

Included in that package is nearly $13 million in electronic eavesdropping equipment to intercept militants’ cellphone calls. In July, the Pentagon supplied Pakistan with 200 night vision goggles, 100 day/night scopes, more than 600 radios and 9,475 sets of body armor.

The Pentagon has also sharply increased programs to bring Pakistani officers to the United States for training, particularly in counterterrorism.

So why is Shireen Mazari suggesting that the military distance itself from the US!?! Today’s editorial says, “It is time to create a distance between the Pakistan and US militaries.”

Let’s think about what this would mean in practical defense terms. If Shireen Mazari had her way, our military would not have:

  • New Mi-17 helicopters
  • New F-16 warplanes
  • Cobra helicopter gunship parts
  • Night vision goggles
  • Body armor to protect our soldiers
  • Eavesdropping equipment to gather intelligence
  • Hi-resolution infrared sensors for F-16 warplanes
  • Training by the world’s superpower
  • $500 million in arms
  • Hundreds of day/night scopes
  • Hundreds of radios

This is only part of the equipment and training provided to Pakistan by the US military. What do you think India would do if we took Shireen Mazari’s advice and cut off our military supplies? Probably declare a national holiday! To turn our backs on this assistance would be to sign our own suicide note.

Surely there is ample suspicion and distrust between Paksitan and the US. But notice that this is never the result of military officials. It is almost never even the result of political officials! No, what causes this suspicion and mistrust is the uninformed writings of questionable characters like Shireen Mazari. Who is she working for, we ask! Certainly not for a strong Pakistan.

Rather than turning our backs on the world’s superpower and cutting off essential sources of advanced military equipment and training, Gen. Kiyani and the military officials should be working to foster closer ties with the American military officers and breaking down barriers of mistrust. Once our military pushes aside those who stand in our way (Shireen Mazari) and develops a partnership of mutual trust with the American military, no one will dare to threaten our nation.

Powered by WordPress