Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

December 3, 2009

Does Obama Plan Provide Opportunity or Danger for Pakistan?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , — admin @ 11:16 am

Obama Plan: Danger or Opportunity for Pakistan?Following his speech on Tuesday night announcing his plan to increase American troop levels in Afghanistan by 30,000, discussion has turned to the obvious question: Does Obama’s plan provide opportunity or danger for Pakistan?

PM Gilani has said that he would like “more clarity on the situation” before he can implement the plan, and the editors of Dawn said that the announcement raised questions as well as providing answers.

As strategies go, the one laid out by Mr Obama is not especially ambitious, at least in theory: ‘the three core elements of our strategy [are]: a military effort to create the conditions for a transition; a civilian surge that reinforces positive action; and an effective partnership with Pakistan’.

But experience suggests that the war zone in Afghanistan does not lend itself to a ‘civilian surge’ in quick order.

The British discovered this in Helmand several years ago. And Mr Obama should himself know this because he promised a similar civilian surge in his March speech on his ‘first’ AfPak strategy, but it did not materialise.

So even if there are military successes thanks to the additional troops that are to be injected into Afghanistan, it is not clear whether success on the civilian side is possible within the time frame that Mr Obama has set.

The editors of The News had a similar reaction:

Mostly, the speech was about the bricks and mortar of warfare. What was missing was a description of the bricks and mortar that would go into nation-building and here lies the weakness at the heart of the Obama strategy. A sketchy 272 words were devoted to the process of nation-building and reconstruction. It is the failure to give equal weight to the military and civilian vision that has bedevilled the engagement of America and the NATO countries in Afghanistan from the outset.

This part of the plan – the process of reconstruction in Afghanistan – is something that the Americans rarely talk about because they don’t have the experience or expertise to do it. Let’s look at the facts.

  • First, it does not need to be stated that peace and stability in Afghanistan requires Pakistani help. The Americans know this, which is why Obama very openly pledged “to remain a strong supporter of Pakistan’s security and prosperity long after the guns have fallen silent.” Here we have the worlds only superpower, who can destroy a country at will, pledging to support a strong and prosperous Pakistan. This should not go without notice.
  • Second, Pakistan needs peace and stability for our own security and economic growth. Ignoring militantism in Afghanistan will only increase the violence that plagues our nation today. It was years of neglect that has given the TTP and LeT the ability to attack our own military headquarters. It is this same violence and the resulting political instability that scares away investors from China, UAE, and USA, preventing our own economic growth to rival that of India.

But Pakistan not only needs a stable and secure Afghanistan for our own security and prosperity, we alone have the experience in building a civil society that is necessary to save Afghanistan. Such a success would not only result in our having a strong ally on our Western border, it would give us strong allies throughout the West – US, UK, EU, etc.

While many items in the Obama plan remain to be worked out among the involved nations, the Obama plan presents a vital opportunity for Pakistan to get a seat at the world’s table and demonstrate that we are an important player in global affairs. Obviously, no success will be had in Afghanistan without the all-important investment from Pakistan’s military and civil government.

The Obama plan is filled with both danger and opportunity for Pakistan. Danger if we put our heads in the sand and turn our backs on reality. Opportunity for us to take our proper place at the world’s table, securing a strong and prosperous future for our country.

November 10, 2009

UPDATE: Musharraf Exposes India Involvement in Pak Terror

Filed under: india — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 8:55 am

A couple of weeks ago I asked the question, Are Pakistan’s Anti-US Hawks Indian Trojan Horses? This post clearly demonstrated that the support of JI and some hyper-nationalists are supporting India either intentionally or inadvertently. Some have claimed that this is too far fetched – that the attempt to weaken Pakistan was not a plot by India to isolate Pakistan from alliances with global superpowers so that they can dominate South Asia.

But yesterday, former president Pervez Musharraf said that India and RAW have been plotting secret conspiracies to rule the region.

India and its secret agencies had been hatching conspiracies against Pakistan by making their hegemony in Afghanistan, he said and added that Pakistan had proof regarding the involvement of India in terrorist activities in Pakistan.

As former Chief of Army Staff and President of Pakistan, Musharraf would have had access to intelligence that made clear the connection between Indian meddling and terrorism in Pakistan.

In fact, looking at recent attacks in Pakistan, there is a clear thread of evidence that points to Indian involvement:

1. The bombing on Sunday in Peshawar targeted a bazaar where people were buying sacrifices for Eid al-Adha.

2. Attacks have been targeting military officers. On October 22, one brigadier was murdered in Islamabad. And again this past weekend another assassination attempt was made against a brigadier.

This again raises the point that those jihadi sympathizers and pro-jihadi elements like Ahmed Quraishi are either intentionally or inadvertently supporting Indian efforts to weaken Pakistan.

When America was attacked on 9/11, the media did not begin to support Osama bin Laden and his band of hijackers. Rather, the people of America stood together to protect their country. A common cry was “Support Our Troops!”

Why in Pakistan are we determined to commit suicide by not supporting our military, but rather supporting these figures like JI that never wanted Pakistan to exist in the first place, or Ahmed Quraishi who makes his millions promoting conspiracy stories and supporting the terrorists that are murdering our courageous military officers and soldiers?

It is time for Real Pakistani Nationalists reject these distractions and Indian Trojan Horses and to stand up for our military.

October 22, 2009

Are Pakistan’s Anti-US Hawks Indian Trojan Horses?

Are Pakistan’s anti-American hawks – those constantly attacking the Americans and standing against close ties between Pakistan and the United States – Indian Trojan Horses? After all, at a time when India’s close relations with Washington are bringing it billions of dollars in investment and trade, sophisticated defence equipment and a civil nuclear deal, Pakistan’s anti-American turn can only benefit India.

The term “Trojan Horse” dates back to the Greek civilization and basically means “any trick that causes a target to invite a foe into a securely protected bastion or place.” We now know that even Baitullah Mehsud was an Indian agent as he received lots of funds from the Indian intelligence agencies. But for years Pakistan’s Jihadis and their media advocates built Mehsud up as an anti-American hero.

Indian support for Mehsud is no surprise. As we proved in the first part of this series, only India stands to gain from the destabilization of Pakistan’s government and from worsening Us-Pakistan relations. The question for this part of the series, then, is who are the Pakistani anti-US hawks that are intentionally or inadvertently acting as Indian Trojan Horses?

A daarhi does not a patriot make.

The meddling by Indian intelligence service RAW in Afghanistan and support for the destabilizing religious militants there is also no secret. Of course they do not want to see a strong and independent Islamic republic in Afghanistan that has normal relations with Pakistan, and they know the most effective way of ensuring that Afghanistan is unstable – and by that effect, sapping Pakistan’s resources – is to support militants.

Likewise, it has been well documented that Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and Baitullah Mehsud received substantial funding and support from RAW. And this should come as no surprise, really – after all, should Mehsudis prevail, it will be India that gains the most.

This use of religion to confuse and manipulate the ummah is a most diabolical act, but there are just as many civilian Trojan Horses also. Let us take a look at all those people who in the last one year have been attacking the attempts by the elected Zardari government to build better ties with United States.

Hypernationalists, Anti-Americanism, and India’s Prospering

Hypernationalists are often specifically targeted by intelligence agents who manipulate their passionate loyalties. We must not forget that, despite his support for Musharraf, Ahmed Quraishi’s anti-American rants created problems between the Americans and the Musharraf administration. Could it be that he is manipulated by India as what in intelligence parlance is known as “an unwitting agent?”

An inadvertent agent is often more valuable to intelligence agencies than intentional ones because they can easily pass lie detection devices and do not give themselves away so easily. After all, if Ahmed Quraishi believes he is being a nationalist, he will be more believable.

Let us also look at people like Hamid Gul and Shahid Masood. Again these people are well known anti-Indians, but their pitch has always been more anti-American. Why does Shahid Masood live in Dubai? Whom does he meet in Dubai? There are lots of Indians in Dubai and do any of them finance or influence him? Should that not be the subject of some analysis or concern in Islamabad?

Trojan Horses in Parliament?

Jamaat-e-Islami’s founder Maulana Maududi was opposed to the creation of Pakistan from the beginning and since independence the JI’s chief goal has been to grab power in the name of Islam. The overall effect of the Jamaat-e-Islami’s policies –whether in erstwhile East Pakistan or in Pakistan today—has been to weaken the Pakistani state? The Jamaatis constantly divide Pakistanis along religious lines. They make us think of each other as Kafirs or bad Muslims or unpatriotic. There is no difficulty visualizing that RAW is creating Trojan Horses from Jamaatis with the objective of not letting Pakistan live in peace.

If we turn to the Pakistan Muslim League (Q) are there any persons there who could be Trojan Horses? During Musharraf’s era they wanted to normalize relations with India and were content with being US surrogates. Both Tariq Azeem and Khurshid Kasuri who these days are screaming at the top of their lungs about the Kerry-Lugar bill were championing the opening of ties with India.

Pakistan Muslim League (N) is no better. Its hostility to the Pakistan army resulted in the 1999 coup d’etat and the party has no lost no opportunity to control the army or to put down the army top brass. While in power PML (N) initiated the bus diplomacy with India and even invited Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee to Pakistan against the wishes of the military. It maintained good relations with the United States. But out of power it is happy to push the anti-India, anti-US button as if destablising Pakistan is its real objective.

So what have these Trojan Horses tried to do?

One, engineer a clash between the civilian government and the military to make Pakistan unstable and weak.

Two, tried to also create a clash between US and Pakistan to ensure that India is not whipped by the superpower and US interests in America continue to expand while Pakistan’s ability to lobby the US continue to weaken.

Three, launched an attack campaign to discredit the reputation of those in the government who are well liked by Americans like President Zardari, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Ambassador Husain Haqqani and others to make Pakistan appear weak and childish in front of the world. If the hawks are the only Pakistani faces for Americans, the US will continue to turn against Pakistan thereby strengthening the Indo-US relationship.

Four, it is very interesting that this debate on Kerry-Lugar is the first debate in Pakistan where there is no mention of India, only anti-Americanism. Since when have we heard so little about the RAW involvement in such an issue?

Trojan Horses weaken Pakistan

Pakistan has been a nuclear power for over 20 years and yet doesn’t seem to have obtained the security it sought. Why? This is because the Indian lobby and RAW has worked nonstop to interfere with our relations with other world powers. It was India that helped create a clash between Nawaz Sharif and the United States over the nuclear weapons program while making sure that India obtained a nuclear deal as well as supply of nuclear fuel. Today, this interference with Pakistan’s security continues through the manipulation of Kerry-Lugar debate by these Indian Trojan Horses.

REAL Pak Nationalists

Pakistanis know that in order to stand up to the Indian threat they need support – military and economic – from the Americans and need American understanding to make sure India does not throw its weight around in South Asia. Causing a clash between Pakistan and its oldest ally, United States, cannot be the work of true Pakistani nationalists. It has to be the work of Indian Trojan Horses who claim to be acting in Pakistan’s interest while actually undermining it.

July 26, 2009

How Do We Fix This Love Affair?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , — admin @ 1:58 pm

Diving into the history of US-Pakistan relations may seem to be a good platform to initiate the conversation of this paper.  However, I personally feel that consistently reminding ourselves of the roller coaster relationship we have had with the United States is not in our interests at this point in time.  Focusing on the future with our national interest as our foremost priority should be the stance the Pakistan government needs to uphold. Meanwhile, the United States is also required to re-evaluate its strategy towards Pakistan in order to successfully gain the respect of Pakistani citizens.

The United States has always seemed to be Pakistan’s best friend when it only serves their own purpose.  This is the common perception that Pakistani’s have of the US and has only been reaffirmed with the quick withdrawal of US assistance after the Soviets left Afghanistan, the placement of sanctions after testing the nuclear bomb and the billions of dollars of aid that Pakistan received after 9/11.

Many journalists in the US media argued against Pakistan’s acceptance of the Taliban and how this country of a 170 million people was sympathetic towards their radical cause.  This constant reminder has made Americans grow wary of Pakistan and her citizens.  However, this should not be the case.  Pakistan has taken the war to the militants, and has gone to great lengths in order to root out those very terrorists who threaten Pakistan’s peace and security.  The United States needs to acknowledge the work of the Pakistan Army and citizens.  And in order to reduce the trust deficit, the US media community needs to stop portraying Pakistan in a dark image, especially in terms of leakage of nuclear weapons to terrorists and
the government falling to the Taliban.

First and foremost, the United States needs to not only successfully complete its mission in Afghanistan, but also more importantly, be a vital player in the rebuilding of this war torn nation.  The United States is required to invest heavily in the Afghan infrastructure that has been bombarded while also focusing on basic human needs such as food, shelter, clothing, health and education for the Afghan people. The US needs to show serious commitment and firmness once the military offensive has completed, which must reciprocate into action as this would greatly benefit both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Secondly, the United States needs to show its commitment towards Pakistan through long-term goals and put to rest the perception of only short-term gains.  No doubt, the United States has helped Pakistan greatly over the years.  Since Pakistan’s inception, billions of dollars have been given in aid for both, military and non-military assistance.  What we as a nation have to show for this aid may be difficult but surely the effects are not absent.  Many private industries within Pakistan have US investors, whereas various sectors such as electrical energy, agriculture and development have also been given US assistance and logistics.

Although the United States has clearly helped Pakistan over the course of the past 62 years, more is required.  But it is also Pakistan’s responsibility to not ‘expect’ aid merely for providing assistance.

We need to work on our internal political concerns in order to create a safe and secure democratic Pakistan.  It is difficult to stabilize our democratic institutions primarily due to the years of military dictatorship that we as a nation have endured.  Many assume it is the easier route to blame military dictators for the political and economic problems we face today but we as citizens are required to look at ourselves first before pointing the finger of blame upon others.  It is here where I repeat Quaid’s words “united we stand,
divided we fall”.

We must as a nation start giving credit where it is due.  We need to accept that the United States has been our ally and has provided assistance to us over the years.  We Pakistanis have this tendency of often picking on the criticism and pointing out the flaws of a relationship.  This style of criticism is not healthy nor is it constructive and with the roller coaster relationship we have had with the United States, it has provided much fodder for the hard line critics.

By correcting its foreign policy and making it more Pakistan friendly, the US may be doing itself more of a favor, while it would be protecting the national interest of both countries.  It is difficult for any government to conduct business if it has dissatisfied its citizens.  If the United States enjoys labeling itself as the beacon of democracy, it must represent itself through actions as well.

Championing for democracy requires that one promotes accountability, liberty and justice, freedom of speech and religion for all. President Obama today, is arguing the cause for health care reform but most importantly he is not acting unilaterally and is exhaustively attempting to bring republicans and democrats on board.  This approach of acting in the interests of all parties involved should also be extending when determining foreign policy.  The US and Pakistani governments need all the political capital they can gain when clearing our world of the menace of terrorism.  This is a multilateral fight that requires trust, cooperation and understanding from both countries.

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress