Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

August 5, 2010

Where is the outrage now?

Filed under: Media — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 8:35 am

Where is the Ghairat Brigade? Where are the nationalists? Where are the defenders of Pakistan’s honour when our very President is being insulted by the foreign media? Why they remain silent when the representative of the nation is being tarred by foreigners?

My blood began to boil today when I read in The News that foreign media is attacking our president. Of course, these hypocrites in the media are actually SUPPORTING ATTACKS ON PAKISTAN because they are not nationalists, they are not patriots – NO. They are hypocrites one and all.

وَإِذَا رَأَيْتَهُمْ تُعْجِبُكَ أَجْسَامُهُمْ وَإِنْ يَقُولُوا تَسْمَعْ لِقَوْلِهِمْ كَأَنَّهُمْ خُشُبٌ مُسَنَّدَةٌ يَحْسَبُونَ كُلَّ صَيْحَةٍ عَلَيْهِمْ هُمُ الْعَدُوُّ فَاحْذَرْهُمْ قَاتَلَهُمُ اللَّهُ أَنَّى يُؤْفَكُونَ

You do not have to be a supporter of Zardari, but a true patriot is a SUPPORTER OF PAKISTAN! And does not allow insults to our leaders by foreign medias.

Where is Shireen Mazari now? Where is Ahmed Quriashi? Where is the pride now? Where is the outrage now? It is silence from these hypocrites only.

REAL PAKISTANI NATIONALISTS WILL NOT REMAIN SILENT AS OUR PRESIDENT IS INSULTED BY FOREIGN MEDIA!!!

August 4, 2010

The Nation or The Hindu? Hard To Tell Difference Sometimes

Filed under: india,Media — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 12:48 pm

The Hindu

The Nation

The Hindu published a vicious attack on COAS Gen. Kayani this week saying that he is supporting jihadi elements, even while our troops are on the front lines of battle fighting these militants.

Ambassador Husain Haqqani has already made the point to NDTV that it is our own military – led by Gen. Kayani – that is making the greatest sacrifice to fighting extremism, and that we will not be intimidated by India in this fight.

Ambassador Haqqani: Pakistan’s Intelligence Services, Pakistan’s Military, and Pakistan’s Government have taken a very clear stand against terrorism and extremism. Over the last two years, more Pakistanis have died fighting terrorism than any other country’s military. We have already proven our sincerity in fighting terrorism through our actions. I don’t think that we will engage in a debate with anyone – an individual legislator in the United States, an individual political figure in India, or for that matter any of our individual critics in the region. Time will prove that Pakistan made a clear choice, and our choice was to rid our entire region and the world of terrorism, and we will not endure terrorist attacks in any part of the world, including in any of our neighbouring countries.

NDTV: Since a lot of what you do here in Washington as Pakistan’s Ambassador is impacted by the India-Pakistan-Afghanistan dynamic, what role do you think India can legitimately play in Afghanistan without causing Pakistan to feel buffeted in?

Ambassador Haqqani: I think that the best course for India in Afghanistan is to make sure that whatever they do there does not create misgivings in Pakistan, a little more transparency, a little more open discussion as neighbours that this is what we are about to do. It’s a part of the confidence building that we need to do to overcome the misgivings of the past. Look, we all know that there are always issues that each side can raise with one another, complaints that one can have towards one another, but if the intention is to have a stable Afghanistan, a stable Pakistan, and a stable India, playing their respective roles, working together, then I think we can find a way of reassuring each other. In Afghanistan, as long as there is no significant military intelligence activity that Pakistan finds threatening, India of course will remain a country with which the Afghans will do business, and similarly, at some point in future, Pakistan itself looks forward to a normal trade relationship with India, but until we get there, we have to have a more reassuring posture towards one another. There are things Pakistan has to take India into confidence over just to be reassuring, and similarly India has to understand that it had to do that.

Of course, it is not only The Hindu that is making such blatant attacks on our military force, but again the fifth-column in our borders called The Nation is up to its old tricks. Writing about Gen. Kayani’s extension, The Nation says it is a bad idea:

WHILE it was expected that General Kayani would get an extension, the unprecedented full three-year term extension came as a surprise, especially because it was granted by a civilian government. What was equally unprecedented was the Prime Minister announcing this extension of the COAS’s term through an address to the nation. The announcement for this address also came barely an hour before leading one to wonder why there was this haste to sew things up for General Kayani. No one can deny General Kayani’s professionalism and competency as well as his assiduous efforts to keep the military out of politics and back in the barracks in the post-Musharraf era. Having said that, the manner and timing of the extension, as well as the time period, all raise some serious issues.

Beyond these points of contention, there is the whole policy of extensions for senior civil and military bureaucrats that itself is highly contentious. Our problem in Pakistan has always been that institutional development has been thwarted by the rulers reliance on individuals rather than the institutions they serve. This renders institutional development superfluous. That in turn hinders a cohesive decision-making process to evolve and be strengthened and our policies only reflect the personal whims and preferences of individuals.

It almost sounds like the same people are writing for The Hindu and The Nation. Certainly both are against our military.

July 23, 2010

Ahmed Quraishi Calls Military "Humiliating" and "Incapable"

Filed under: Media,Taliban — Tags: , , — admin @ 9:15 am

It is no secret that Ahmed Quraishi hates America, but now he has started to insult the military too. His latest article on his web site is nothing but a long criticism of the military, calling it incompetent and weak. Why is Ahmed Quraishi trying to undermine the military at a time that we are under attack by jihadis and feeling tension from India?

Supposedly a complaint about trade deal, the real target of Ahmed’s slanderous article is the military. After criticising the deal by suggesting that it is against Pak interests, Ahmed Quraishi says “What’s more likely is that the Pakistani military was consulted before granting this concession to US, Afghanistan and, indirectly, India.” Also he says that the number of US military personnel in Pakistan “would not be possible without a nod from the Pakistani military”.

So now Ahmed Quraishi is saying that government and military both are working against Pak interest? What exactly does he think is Pakistan’s interest? Talibans?

Ahmed Quraishi goes on to say that “the Pakistani military is on board” with “humiliating concessions” and “self-defeating compromises”. He accuses the Pakistan military of being “incapable”.

This is the ‘super-patriot’ Ahmed Quraishi who is throwing these terrible insults at our own military? Or is it the ‘media Taliban’ Ahmed Quraishi. I think it is obvious which.

June 18, 2010

The Nation Surrenders, But REAL Pakistanis Want to FIGHT

Filed under: Media,Taliban,USA — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 6:23 am

Pakistan Army

The Taliban’s unofficial newspaper, The Nation, has written an editorial today asking the military to surrender to Taliban but REAL Pakistani Nationalists want to FIGHT.

The article in today’s The Nation is called ‘A sinister enemy’ and indeed The Nation is a sinister enemy of Pakistan for what it writes.

In this backdrop, the straight option for the Pakistan Army is to give up its penchant for US military equipment and terminate the ongoing offensive.

Can you believe it??? The Nation is demanding that Pakistan Army give up. While The Nation is writing its surrender letter to Taliban, our brave soldiers are searching for troops that these very Taliban have kidnapped and are holding prisoner. The Nation would just give them up as dead.

But REAL Pakistani Nationalists will NEVER SURRENDER to these Talibans. Look at the new poll information that is reported in Dawn:

No Muslim country surveyed recorded majority support for suicide bombing, Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. In Pakistan, only ten per cent like Taliban and only 9 per cent support Al Qaeda.

As many as seventy per cent Pakistanis have unfavourable views of the Taliban and sixty-one per cent reject Al Qaeda openly.

Actually REAL Pakistani Nationalists do not want to give up American military support for surrender to Taliban.

It is not surprising that American cooperation with the Pakistani military is popular, given the confidence that Pakistanis have in it. As many as eighty-six per cent say the military is having a good influence on the country

So why The Nation wants to surrender? Because they are Taliban lovers, not Pakistanis.

March 12, 2010

Did Army Snub Ahmed Quraishi, Shareen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood?

Filed under: Media — Tags: , , , , , , , — admin @ 10:31 am

Not invited

A few weeks ago, Army Chief Gen. Kiyani invited editors and columnists to a press briefing. Interestingly, Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood were not invited. Was this an intentional snub by the military brass to send a clear signal that these people do not speak for the military? Or was it just that these journalists are so irrelevant that the Army did not think to invite them?

Usually, if a reporter is truly close to the establishment, they are not only invited, they are given special access like a closed door briefing before the official briefing so that they can get background statements from the officials. These four not only got no invitation to a closed door briefing, they were not even invited to the regular press briefing!

Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood are well known for claiming to be unofficial experts on the Pakistani establishment – especially the military. They are always saying that they have spoken to high up sources, even when what they say turns out to be wrong. But it seems from this latest snub that they are not as connected as they claim to be.

Ahmed Quraishi and Shireen Mazari in particular tend to represent ‘old think’ on security issues. They support a military coup and for the military to cut iself off from allied powers and are opposed to the present democracy and the way that Gen. Kiyani is working with the government.

While each of them probably has some contacts from the military, it could be that their contacts may not be current military leaders. Also, it could be that their sources are actually retired military or ex-military who supported the Musharraf and Zia dictatorships and are filling their heads with false information rather than accurate information in attempt to disrupt the actual policies of the current military establishment.

If this is the case, it makes sense for them not to receive invitations to press briefings by the military brass. The military leadership would recognize them as working for elements that are opposing the actual plans and policies of Gen. Kiyani and his staff so they would refuse them any invitations.

None of these media personalities will reveal who their sources are, so we do not know if this is the case. It could be that sometimes their sources do not exist at all, but are simply invented in order to give their articles and talk shows some air of authority that is missing. But it seems very apparent that if they cannot even get an invitation to a public press briefing, they probably do not have sources that are very high up.

Was this a calculated snub? Is it because Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood do not represent the Army? Are Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood reflecting an old mindset from the past that the present establishment wants to distance itself from? Or does the military brass think that Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood are just too irrelevant to bother inviting them?

Whatever the answers are, one thing is made clear by the snub – Ahmed Quraishi, Shireen Mazari, Shaheen Sehbai, and Shahid Masood obviously do not speak for the military.

February 11, 2010

Contradictory Attitudes

Filed under: hypernationalists,Media,NRO,Taliban,terrorism — admin @ 6:12 pm

There is no doubt that Pakistan is facing a myriad of problems from all sides – economic, social, political, and militant. It is the times such as these that try men’s souls, that show the world what a people stands for, and perhaps more importantly, what they stand against.

We have seen truly altruistic expressions from Pakistanis, from the support of women’s rights, to the nation-wide attention paid to the story of Shazia Masih.

However, the sad truth is a much more powerful and ugly attitude seems to be gaining traction. That would be the constant cry of “We are the victims!” We have heard this from the pundits and now it seems to be seeping into the public consciousness.

The fact is, that is nothing short of a tragic attitude. With that sort of mentality, how can we progress as a nation? How can we tap into the hope children are born with instead of telling them that nothing will ever go right? There is so much potential in Pakistanis that the world ought to see, and this attitude is just a shame.

Take for instance the fact that we can explain everything away via conspiracy theory. Indeed, it would appear that there is a conspiracy theory for every incident in our history.

Another glaring hypocrisy comes to mind. Pundits are infuriated at the West’s policies of screening people from Pakistan at their airports. We hear screams of racial profiling, anti-Islamic sentiment, and grossly unfair treatment. We hear the demands that Pakistan be taken off such a program immediately.

While the demands of nothing short of the royal treatment for Pakistanis abroad are all well and good, it cannot be ignored that Pakistanis accept even encourage sectarian violence in domestic circles.

A handful of clerics have been whipping up a storm of hostility towards Shiites and Ahmedis, the latter in particular. The well-known televangelist Aamir Liaqat essentially declared the murder of an Ahmedi Muslim to be perfectly right. Ahmedi schools are shut down, Ahmedis themselves are gunned down in hit-and-run accidents, and the whole nation sits mute. The attacks on Shiites – on the religious days of Ashura and Chellum – showcase the cancerous hatred Sunnis have for the second largest sect.

The two are absurdly contradictory. How can there be calls for justice for Muslims – a minority abroad – while we assent to an open season on Shiites and Ahmedis at home?

We have to be reasonable with what we call for. We must demand parity abroad and practice it at home. Anything different would be hypocritical and unjustifiable in Pakistanis.

Contradictory Attitudes

There is no doubt that Pakistan is facing a myriad of problems from all sides – economic, social, political, and militant. It is the times such as these that try men’s souls, that show the world what a people stands for, and perhaps more importantly, what they stand against.

We have seen truly altruistic expressions from Pakistanis, from the support of women’s rights, to the nation-wide attention paid to the story of Shazia Masih.

However, the sad truth is a much more powerful and ugly attitude seems to be gaining traction. That would be the constant cry of “We are the victims!” We have heard this from the pundits and now it seems to be seeping into the public consciousness.

The fact is, that is nothing short of a tragic attitude. With that sort of mentality, how can we progress as a nation? How can we tap into the hope children are born with instead of telling them that nothing will ever go right? There is so much potential in Pakistanis that the world ought to see, and this attitude is just a shame.

Take for instance the fact that we can explain everything away via conspiracy theory. Indeed, it would appear that there is a conspiracy theory for every incident in our history.

Another glaring hypocrisy comes to mind. Pundits are infuriated at the West’s policies of screening people from Pakistan at their airports. We hear screams of racial profiling, anti-Islamic sentiment, and grossly unfair treatment. We hear the demands that Pakistan be taken off such a program immediately.

While the demands of nothing short of the royal treatment for Pakistanis abroad are all well and good, it cannot be ignored that Pakistanis accept even encourage sectarian violence in domestic circles.

A handful of clerics have been whipping up a storm of hostility towards Shiites and Ahmedis, the latter in particular. The well-known televangelist Aamir Liaqat essentially declared the murder of an Ahmedi Muslim to be perfectly right. Ahmedi schools are shut down, Ahmedis themselves are gunned down in hit-and-run accidents, and the whole nation sits mute. The attacks on Shiites – on the religious days of Ashura and Chellum – showcase the cancerous hatred Sunnis have for the second largest sect.

The two are absurdly contradictory. How can there be calls for justice for Muslims – a minority abroad – while we assent to an open season on Shiites and Ahmedis at home?

We have to be reasonable with what we call for. We must demand parity abroad and practice it at home. Anything different would be hypocritical and unjustifiable in Pakistanis.

February 1, 2010

Importance of Defending the Rule of Law

Filed under: Defense,hypernationalists,Media,NRO — admin @ 12:14 pm


In the course of establishing a democracy, all agree rule of law must be respected and reign supreme. It is generally understood that the slightest concession to military dictatorship or a hardliner ideology may cause a fledgling democracy to teeter. Indeed, that has been the case in Pakistan, as public demand for democracy has struggled to come up for air but has consistently been submerged in the depths of the far right’s conservatism or elite’s love for military dictatorships.

Finally though, we are on the right track. Pakistan has established itself as more than a fledging democracy; democracy has stood firm in the face extremism, has survived economic calamity and is on its way to its first real test of democratic institutions.

President Zardari has given multiple statements in support of democracy. As opposed to previous leaders who clamped down on the media at an atricle’s notice, President Zardari has spoken directly to his detractors and the people of Pakistan regarding the media’s penchant for conspiracy theories. The silver lining in all of the foggy and unfounded political stories is this: more and more people are recognizing that the democratically-elected government is working for the people and the issues. Take the comprehensive and thought-out aid packages sent to the NWFP or to Balochistan. This is a government that is taking its job of service to the people very seriously…as a democratic government ought to!

The fact is, we must allow this government to work for us and continue to function. We are seeing democracy in action, and for those of us who grew up either listening to stories of Pakistan’s suffering or seeing it for ourselves (certain leaders sacking judges and deeming the Constitution irrelevant!) this is a truly tremendously promising time.

The PPP is in power and there are challenges to their authority. Rather than jump on the cheap political trick mentality, the rival party of the PML-N is being admirable and allowing the courts to decide what is right or wrong. This is something to be lauded. We see here that the PML-N respect the rule of law, and trust doing so will lead to the right decision for Pakistan’s future.

The rule of law they – as well as future generations of Pakistanis – are depending on will come in the form of the NRO implementation. As our political leaders across the spectrum are respecting their boundaries, so too must the courts.

Only when our institutions acknowledge the system of checks & balances and work to adhere by it can we continue down the path of democracy.

January 12, 2010

People Over Politics Should be the New Trend!

Filed under: Defense,hypernationalists,Media,NRO,Taliban — Tags: — admin @ 1:17 pm

The media is reporting that President Zardari has directed provincial authorities to form peace committees after the tragic wave of violence to hit Karachi.

This is exactly what our country needs at this time. We need to stop the nonsensical party fighting. All it leads to is cheap, shoddy political tactics taking crucial attention away from what people are dealing with at the local levels.

Let’s not forget Karachi is home to the stock exchange and the central bank. Our people are dying and the economy faces huge risks. No matter what people think of the administration, this is the absolute right direction we need to be going in! I am just tired of the political games being played, it’s time for real sense and real action from our leaders.

January 10, 2010

Extremist-sympathizers? Give me a break!

Filed under: Defense,hypernationalists,Media,Taliban,terrorism — admin @ 8:27 am

Every single Pakistani should grit his teeth in anger. Our nation is being attacked from the insidious cancer of extremism, and there are STILL voices out there that serve as apologists for these mass murderers.

Since October, the brave and noble men of the Army have gone in and tried to stop the extremists. To speak in sympathetic terms of extremists is to speak against our troops, and that is unacceptable.

If anyone needs further proof, have a look at the latest headlines:

Police say a bomb has exploded outside a provincial lawmaker’s compound on the outskirts of the northwestern Pakistan city of Peshawar.

Police official Bashir Khan says nobody was harmed by Sunday’s blast, which damaged a wall outside a building where lawmaker Aalimgir Khan often meets with guests.

And so here we are…another example of extremists wanting to destroy the system of governance of our nation. True patriotism requires we emphatically denounce them, not serve as their public relations team!

December 5, 2009

The Nation Is Out Of Touch With Reality

Filed under: Defense,Media — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 9:56 am

The Nation has really gone out of touch with reality this time, and has all but asked Pakistan to commit national suicide. Reading today’s editorials, I could only think that The Nation has decided to be disagreeable only for the habit of it.

This week has been the time of important events that mark changes in the security situation of our nation. First, US President Barack Hussein Obama announced that he will increase the number of American troops in Afghanistan for two year in effort to stabilize peace and provide greater training to Afghani police and military. Very clear in his speech was the point that Obama does not want American troops in Afghanistan for more than is necessary to improve training for Afghani military.

Second, we have seen a rise in the brazen violence by jihadis. In our own Rawalpindi, militants were so bold as to commit a suicide bomb attack against a mosque. This has prompted the editors of Dawn to say:

In these columns, we have repeatedly warned the security establishment here that any ‘good Taliban/bad Taliban’ distinction needs to be dropped for the long-term security of the country.

In Mogadishu, a suicide bomber disguised himself in women’s clothes to infiltrate a graduation ceremony. This is evidence that militants are taking a broad view in their efforts to destabilize governments, and shows that we must be on alert against these forces. The editors of Daily Times wrote today:

A suicide bomber is virtually impossible to stop once he or she embarks on the mission in hand. The only way such tactics can be scotched is if good intelligence and police work succeeds in pre-empting the mission. Reactive beefing up of security after every such incident, something we in Pakistan (and arguably elsewhere) are wedded to, and which soon falls prey to normal inertia, cannot be the answer. Good intelligence and police work implies infiltration of the extremist groups to head off plans before they mature and using an aware citizenry as the eyes and ears of the security forces. Without the involvement of the citizen of every threatened country, the security forces will remain on the back foot, hampered by the forbidding task of seeking out the potential bombers before they are launched. To slay the by now many-headed hydra of terrorism, merely military force will not do.

This is why editors of Dawn conclude that the only way forward for Pakistan is to embrace cooperation with Americans. The Americans must continue working on building trust and listening to Pakistani generals and military officers, though, as it is our commanders who have the closest knowledge of the jihadis. But without cooperation, it is everyone who loses, says Dawn.

A public and/or political backlash against expanded strikes could create further instability in the country.

And American pressure on the drone programme could affect military cooperation in other areas, further complicating counter-insurgency operations in the two countries.

Frustration and unhappiness in both the American and Pakistani camps should not overshadow a basic reality: the two sides need one another if they are to defeat the militants.

If even Dawn and Daily Times are coming to agreement about importance of improving military cooperation with the Americans, why is only The Nation saying to cut off contact with the Americans?

It is time the Pakistani state rationalised and limited its cooperation with the US and access to US institutions. Already a new form of terrorism has come to light targeting military officers and installations. The latest attack on a mosque near GHQ, used largely by the military and their families was well-planned and had similarities to the earlier attack on GHQ. These were not simply “fanatics” but well-trained and well-informed terrorists.

The Nation editors appear to have finally gone completely insane. Here they say that terrorism in Pakistan is getting worse and militants more sophisticated. And their solution? Stop working with other nations who are fighting against jihadis. Next thing to expect is The Nation asking us to commit suicide before terrorists kill us. It is the stupidest solution ever.

Pakistan’s military forces are strong and able to defend our nation. But to stop working with other nations will cut off our military from access to vital intelligence, military technology, and important partnerships that are essential to success. Is it any wonder that The Nation editorials are so out of touch since their editors did not do military service? Perhaps it is time for them to let the military do its job and stop talking about that which they know nothing.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress