Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

February 25, 2010

Why a Strategic Partnership With American Military is Important

The military has received continued praise from American military commanders and political leaders. But more important is the fact that we continue to see success in efforts to drive Taliban butchers out of our towns and villages. Even as we continue to beat them back, though, the militants are continuing to target innocents with their nefarious attacks. Some people say we should negotiate with these terrorists and compromise with the people who are killing our innocents. I disagree.

An article in Dawn yesterday is a reminder of why it is important to build a strategic partnership with the American military so we can get the supplies and counter insurgency training that are key to defeating our REAL enemy.

The Mingora bombing is a grim reminder that while the nation’s attention has turned elsewhere, Swat still poses a serious challenge. In the days leading up to the bombing, it is believed that a former militant commander of Mingora had sneaked back into the area along with several associates and was planning fresh strikes.

A trip to the region scheduled over the weekend by President Zardari and army chief Gen Kayani was also quietly called off. Yet, this does not necessarily mean that a deadly new phase is beginning in the counter-insurgency in Swat. While it was always predicted that the militants would try to melt into the local population after it returned and then renew their attacks against the security forces, the scale of the re-infiltration is not clear yet.

Bear in mind that operations elsewhere have knock-on effects on the various militant sub-groups. The latest army-led operation in Bajaur is believed to have forced militants who had regrouped there to flee elsewhere. Maulana Fazlullah himself is believed to be on the move again and could be in Dir or Afghanistan or the Charmang area of Bajaur. Complicating matters further are rifts among the militants. Faqir Mohammad, the warlord who controlled the safe haven in Bajaur where Maulana Fazlullah was believed to be hiding earlier, has been ejected by an Afghan-Pakistani militant commander, Qari Ziaur Rehman, which could be yet another reason for Swat TTP militants to be on the run again.

While the precise movements may appear confusing, there is little doubt that the army’s push into many parts of Pakistan — up to 11 areas by the army’s own count — has forced the militants to keep moving from place to place. That represents a clear opportunity: it is easier to capture the enemy when he is on the run and moving through areas that are not very familiar. But there does appear to be a lack of reliable and actionable intelligence in real time. Citizen policing has proved effective in parts of Swat, for example, but it cannot go beyond a certain point.

What’s needed is a trained police force with significant intelligence-gathering capabilities. There is an added benefit of such a force: with reprisal killings on the rise and more arrests being made, an effective police force can help curb vigilantism and bring militants to justice. And yet so much time has already been lost in bureaucratic debate. Even in Pakistan proper the provinces have yet to seriously ramp up their police forces. Without such counter-terrorism capabilities, the country will struggle in its long war against militancy.

This was is not over, and these jihadi militants are not going to give up easily. We should not be talking about negotiating a surrender of Pakistan to these invaders. Instead we should be preparing our forces to root them out for good. A strategic relationship with American military will help make this possible.

February 24, 2010

Lahore Fashion Week Showcases Pakistani Talent

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 8:33 am

The city of Lahore has long enjoyed the status of being Pakistan’s cultural capital, and thus served as the perfect backdrop to a dazzling Fashion Week. The four-day long exercise in aesthetic magnificence jolted the world into seeing the beauty and rich vision of Pakistanis.

Lahore Fashion Week, organized by the Pakistan Fashion Design Council, welcomed the chance to show off the creative side of Pakistan and tickets to all shows were sold out instantly.

The fact is, Pakistan has always loved fashion. The Quaid’s sister was a fashion icon in her own right, consistently wearing smart, sophisticated outfits.

Art and beauty have always been part of the fabric of Pakistani culture.

It is for that reason that we Pakistanis reject the claim that Fashion Week was a direct reaction to militancy. Creativity and innovation have long since been inherent in Pakistan, they are not new! What Fashion Week has done is demonstrate who we are as a people to the West: no, we are not the Taliban, and we categorically reject their radical views. All that our fashion shows have illustrated is that we are proud of our culture and we are not willing to let it go.

One of Pakistan’s top models, Vazeena Ahmed, put it best: “You know, we are very liberal — in our way of thinking, in our way of dressing up. Islam does not preach all that the Taliban are telling. For me at least, that’s not being a Muslim. That’s being a terrorist.”

This is who we are. We are a brilliant, imaginative and adventurous people. Our fashions have long since catered to the diversity within Pakistan – a country that boasts people of varying cultures and complexions.

Lahore Fashion Week may have surprised the world, but we know our designing abilities and talents have always been there. We are not a country ruled by the Taliban, our society can never accept such a miserable reality.

Western media portrayed this event as Pakistanis standing firm in the face of conservatism, but that isn’t quite true. We are simply being Pakistanis.

February 23, 2010

Age of Darkness

Filed under: Defense,Taliban — Tags: , , , — admin @ 8:02 am

Bombed out school in Pakistan

There is now no remaining high school in the Safi subdivision of Mohmand Agency. On February 21, the militants blew up the last two that remained intact. As a result, some 20,000 pupils now have no means to learn. It means that they have less opportunity to better their prospects in life or escape the hold of militants. Reports from various parts of the tribal areas tell us how young men with no way to occupy their time are recruited by the Taliban. It is not entirely far-fetched to believe that this could be one purpose behind their onslaught on schools.

So far, according to media reports, some 30 schools have been destroyed in Mohmand Agency. These include 12 schools for girls. Primary, secondary and institutions of higher learning have all been targeted. The pattern of attack suggests a uniform strategy and a single line of action. Indeed, despite the fierce operation against militants we hear regularly of continuing bombardment aimed at destroying schools. The Taliban thus continue their bid to push us all back into the age of darkness and deprive the people even of what limited access they have to basic amenities. We have seen this process continue for too long. The burnt, blackened ruins of schools stand in many places across the tribal areas. The time has come to ask how this destruction can be stopped. Perhaps communities, who seek education for their children, can be involved in the effort. But what is essential is that schools be protected so that even the limited chance to learn available to the children of these areas is not snatched away from them.

Source

February 22, 2010

The youth have a voice, too!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:07 am

In the midst of political turmoil, it is very easy to forget a key demographic: the youth. Pakistani youngsters are watching their democracy be tested and will be the generation that can truly enjoy freedom.
But what do they really want?

As I spoke with friends and family, I saw a solid conservative bent on societal norms. Dating is permissable, but pre-marital sex is most definitely not. Fashion is admired but must not cross lines. Technology is ravenously accepted but other Western ideas are not.

What can we learn from this? It’s quite simple actually: Pakistanis are religious, but do not want to be ruled by clerics. Pakistanis believe in the concept of the “Islamic Democracy.” For a vast majority, democratic principles are inherent in Islam: equality, tolerance, expression. That democracy is only possible without Islam is not something we are willing to accept.

The conversation can then lead to another question: are Pakistanis struggling with democracy versus theocracy? The answer is no. The overwhelming attitude is that the Islamic spirit will continue to be a part of government, illustrated in its laws, education, and social programs. There can be no doubt that Pakistan will continue to be an Islamic state.

The idea that democratic values are existant within Islam is a fantastic one, and if applied successfully, we will have made a monumental contribution to the whole of the Islamic world.

On an upward curve

The following article by Lieutenant-General (Retd) Talat Masood was originally published in The News on 22 February.

Pakistan and US FlagsThe military to military relations between the US and Pakistan seems to be gradually improving. There is a greater level of mutual confidence and less talk of ‘do more’. This has been achieved by enhanced cooperation at operational and intelligence level and is benefiting both sides. It seems sharing is taking place even at the planning stage to ensure greater synergy and to make sure that the operations undertaken by the US on the Afghan side do not have a negative fallout on Pakistan or vice-versa. The importance the US attaches to Pakistan is demonstrated by the frequency of visits by the US military leaders as well. General McChrystal, Commander of the US and ISAF forces, must have visited his counterpart no less than three to four times in one month alone. In addition, General Petraeus and Admiral Mullen, too, are keeping close contacts with General Kayani and other military and civilian leaders. This has resulted in expanded cooperation on a broad front. There is cooperation in training on new equipment and sharing of counter-insurgency doctrines and practices. Our army, although professionally capable, is constrained by the past and it is only through extensive training that we can prepare for the conflict that we are currently facing. This is even more relevant to the training of Frontier Corps whose role in counter-insurgency operations is expanding. Supply of weapons and equipment from the US has somewhat improved, but still there are shortages in critical areas like helicopters, surveillance equipment and specialised vehicles.

Similar momentum is being maintained by the US at a broader political and diplomatic level. General Jones the National Security Advisor has had meetings with the top civilian and military leaders in Pakistan to discuss Pakistan’s concerns about India’s involvement in Afghanistan and the renewal of India- Pakistan dialogue process. Ambassador Holbrooke has also made several visits and Senator John Kerry must have been to Pakistan about three times since the inception of the democratic government to see how civilian projects could be expedited.

The most pressing problem for the Americans is ensuring full cooperation for their current operations in Afghanistan. The spate of recent arrests of some top leaders of Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda including Mullah Ghani Baradar, Ameer Muawiya in Karachi and other parts of Pakistan is another strong indicator of the growing US-Pakistan cooperation. Whether this is going to be a transient phase of their relationship or a permanent inflexion in Pakistan’s policy paradigm may be early to determine. In all likelihood it appears that there is a growing realisation in Pakistan’s security establishment that the previous policy of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds may have run its course. The huge paradox of closely collaborating with the US, receiving substantial economic and military assistance from it on the one hand, and, at the same time being supportive of Afghan Taliban, is no more a viable policy. Besides, the lethal cocktail of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, Afghan Taliban, Al Qaeda and other jihadi organisations such as LeT, LeJ etc. that were erstwhile considered strategic assets are turning out to be an existential threat to the state. When viewed in this context stakes in the success of the US and ISAF in Afghanistan for Pakistan are fairly high. In the event of US failure, civil war would surely follow and it will immediately trigger off a proxy war accompanied by a humanitarian crisis of great proportions. The last thing that Pakistan would like to see is a chaotic Afghanistan, needless to mention that the success of Afghan Taliban will create a reverse ideological and strategic depth in Pakistan. We do not have to remind that Taliban’s extremist ideology would be a huge setback for our modernisation and relevance to the world. For this reason it is not surprising that arrest of such a large number of Afghan Taliban is taking place in Pakistan. This could weaken Afghan Taliban and may induce them to agree to a negotiated settlement.

It is time a serious policy reappraisal is undertaken for reasons of our internal stability as well as for benefiting from a long term strategic partnership with the US. Pakistan’s military with the consent of Afghan government could use its unique position to persuade Afghan Taliban to agree to President Karzai’s reconciliation offer. A negotiated settlement would provide the US with an exit strategy and help in stabilising Afghanistan which is crucial for Pakistan’s own fight against militants. It is likely that Mullah Baradar could become a collaborator and help in the reintegration policy of the US and the reconciliation efforts of President Karzai. Islamabad’s interests are best served if it widens its engagement and interests with other power centers in Afghanistan and not confine it to only Taliban as was the case in the past. Taliban, too, have to grasp the reality that even in the event of their military victory, a war torn Afghanistan will not have peace or economic viability without support from the international community at least in the foreseeable future.

A subtle shift in the US policy is also discernable. Instead of blaming Pakistan it has started appreciating its contribution in the fight against insurgency. The best part is that several strands of relationship between them are gradually being made to match the set of expectations. If this trend continues, current relationship which could be characterised more of a coalition can be transformed into an alliance.

It seems Washington has played a discreet role in persuading India to recommence bilateral dialogue. This, however, does not imply that the US in any way would subordinate its vital strategic partnership with India to meet Pakistan’s concerns. To expect Washington to immerse in conflict resolution will not be compatible with its larger and more immediate objective of bringing stability to Afghanistan. It will nonetheless continue to encourage both India and Pakistan to engage bilaterally to find solutions to issues.

February 19, 2010

Stop the squabbles!

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 9:29 am

Yesterday was a lot like too many other days. Pakistan was ravaged with bombs, with the latest attack taking place at a Khyber mosque. Twenty-nine people were killed, countless
injured.

While our government has been paralyzed dealing with petty issues, while other branches of government have been engaged in a power play, while games are being played to open up cases dealt with years ago, and while the nation has been forced to watch unnecessary drama and finger-pointing…Pakistanis have been suffering.

Terrorism is a cancer to our nation, and to our neighbors. Should that ideology go unchecked, it can lead to a horrific reality — as evidenced by the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. The same ideology has strained our relations even further with our neighbor, India. It is the same ideology that has terrified the West and created a wide chasm between Muslims and non-Muslims. Now, within our own country, terrorism threatens our social, political, economic spheres. It has to be addressed as an issue IN OUR OWN INTERESTS.

There are people with an unfortunate perch from which they are allowed to speak to the public. They shall not be named, but suffice to say their stance that “Terrorism is America’s fight” is absolutely wrong. It boggles the mind that anyone can still say this, with the number of lives lost in Pakistan to terrorism, with the resources, money and manpower we allocate to this issue. Come on already!

One rational voice (in the midst of the ignorant madness!) is that of Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi. In the previous post, we have his comments in full. He essentially declares that we fight this war on terrorism for our own sake. He recognizes that our national security and our children’s future rest on the success of the current initiatives against the extremists. We are NOT being coerced or bullied into fighting this fight.

“We do not want to see the Talibanisation of Pakistan,” he said. “This is service in a common cause.”

It is time we as a nation took the issue as seriously as it ought to be. We must do two things:

1.  As a people, we have to stop accepting the premise that this is America’s fight. Each Pakistani killed has family and friends whose grief knows no bounds. For them, it is their fight too.

2. As an aware public, we have to stop the petty squabbles that dominate our leaders’ attention. The hypocritical rants against Kerry-Lugar, the maniacal obsession of the NRO verdict, the insanely sensationalized headlines regarding a mythical executive and judicial showdown…they have to cease to exist. We have a nation that needs taking care of, and we ought to free our leaders to do their jobs effectively!

February 18, 2010

FM Qureshi On Why We Fight

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 12:19 pm

Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi reminded us why we fight this bloody war. It is not for some American interest or western policy. It is for Pakistan’s interest. It is to secure our own future. To preserve our own nation and culture without being taken over by the foreign invaders who call themselves Taliban.

BRUSSELS: Pakistan’s arrest of an Afghan Taliban commander was not done under pressure from its US ally and shows the sincerity of its fight against terrorism, the foreign minister said on Thursday.

“We have done it because it is in our interests to do so,” Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told Reuters on the sidelines of a security conference in Belgium.

“If you think that Pakistan is deploying over 100,000 troops on the western border under pressure, if you think we are conducting military operations in Pakistan under pressure, that’s the wrong impression,” he said at the EastWest Institute.

“We do not want to see the Talibanisation of Pakistan,” he said. “This is service in a common cause.”

His comments were the first by a senior Pakistani official about the arrest of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, beyond terse statements confirming the event.

Baradar, the most senior Taliban commander ever arrested in Pakistan, was picked up in the southern city of Karachi this month in a raid by Pakistani and US agents.

He was captured as US forces spearheaded one of Nato’s biggest offensives against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Qureshi dismissed a suggestion that the detention showed it had more clout and contacts with militant groups operating on Pakistani soil than it publicly maintains.

“It (the arrest) is a reflection of Pakistan’s seriousness in dealing with terrorism and terrorists,” Qureshi said.

“The world should have been appreciative that a person known to be involved in activities in Afghanistan where there are soldiers from Nato and ISAF was arrested. This is positive.”

Qureshi dismissed the notion that Baradar’s arrest showed that Pakistan could, if it chose, move more forcefully against Pakistani militant groups that see Indian as their main enemy.

He also denied that it was a ploy to ease US pressure on Islamabad for increased help in stabilising Afghanistan.

Some analysts said the Pakistani security establishment realised it must demonstrate cooperation with the United States to stake its claim to a role in any Afghan peace process.

“Can’t the sceptics see the price we have paid for terrorism? The lives lost? The huge economic cost?” he said.

“You can always say the glass is half empty or half full but we feel public opinion has moved against extremism convincingly.”

“We have lost more than anyone else in this fight.”

February 17, 2010

U.S., Pakistan reap benefits of cooperation against Taliban

Filed under: Taliban — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 1:02 pm

Mullah Abdul Baradar is the most senior member of the Afghan Taliban captured in the eight-year war against the movement.

The joint raid conducted by U.S. and Pakistani special forces suggests a change in tactics by Pakistan’s ISI military intelligence service. For years ISI was reluctant to target the Taliban, a movement initially cultivated by Pakistan to counter Indian influence in Afghanistan.

For more, Daljit Dhaliwal interviews Dr. Hassan Abbas, a former Pakistani government official who is now with the Asia Society and the Quaid-i-Azam Chair Professor at Columbia University’s South Asian Institute.

February 15, 2010

Militants Using False Flag Attacks

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 7:59 am

The Nation is reporting today that militants have been using “false flag” attacks to defame the name of the military. “False flag” attacks are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own.

The terrorists camouflaged in military uniform have started harassing residents in Swat and its adjacent areas to defame Pakistan army.

According to military sources, such incident happened in village Akla, 5 kilometer North West of District Shangla where terrorists in uniform with covered faces stormed in house of Haji Mohammad on February 13. Haji Mohammad opened fire on terrorists and forced them to fell, sources said. People living in villages and town of Shangla, Swat and Malakand have already been told by military authorities to be aware of impersonators, sources added. The reason behind the terrorists’ activities is to defame image of Pakistan army, sources maintained.

Do not fall for this type of psychological war. Terrorists are taking on the uniform of military to make a bad name for the military soldiers by committing bad acts.

February 12, 2010

The Case for a Civilian-Based Nuclear Deal

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 1:05 pm

The Wall Street Journal recently had a piece with an intriguing concept: the idea of a civilian-based nuclear deal.

The writer, C. Christine Fair, begins with a “no holds barred” approach by saying Pakistan terrifies the US with its nuclear powers and raging militancy problem.

That very fact goes both ways. Pakistanis feel the US has never accepted its status as a nuclear state. Conspiracy theories abound that the US will team up with any combination of Israel and India in an effort to intimidate Pakistan. The “trust deficit” that leaders on both sides talk about would be decreased with such a nuclear deal, Fair argues.

This is an option worth considering.

Pakistan would finally gain the full acceptance of its status as a nuclear power. This would lead to better relations translating to better security of nuclear networks. We cannot risk terrorist groups gaining knowledge of any sort about our nuclear capabilities.

We have worked too hard to bring our nation where it is today. We have made our country a key player on the world stage. We have to nurture our partnership with the United States, protect our nuclear capacity and be acknowledged by the international community as a legitimate nuclear power.

As Fair writes, “Washington needs a plan that is as bold as the challenges that Pakistan presents.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704820904575056182586146948.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress