Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

January 31, 2010

Could Extremist Pakistani Bloggers be FBI Moles?

Filed under: hypernationalists — Tags: , , , , , , , — admin @ 1:56 pm

Guest Post By Yahya Hussainy

The David Headley aka Daoud Gilani case has been in the media for a few months now. There have been numerous stories about how Headley was not just an extremist but rather a double agent used by US authorities to help fish out other extremists.

The Headley case highlights how sometimes the people taking the hardest line are actually doing so to entice others with extremist potential into revealing themselves. As Al-Qaeda and other Jihadi groups have turned to the internet for recruitment of future foot soldiers, the FBI and the CIA are also using websites to check out who thinks what and who might be a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer.

Given the large number of anti-American and even pro-Jihadi Pakistani websites, I have often wondered if some of the more extreme Pakistani bloggers are also “trolling” to find who in the Pakistani diaspora might actually be a potential Jihadi. Some of the bloggers are so outrageously irrational in their attacks on the US, Israel and India that their authenticity becomes clearly suspect.

Yes, the US allows everyone under the First Amendment of its constitution to express opinions. But didn’t many extreme opinion-holders get visited by the FBI immediately after 9/11? It is a known fact that the FBI keeps track of American Nazis and anti-Semites in case they go beyond expressing extreme opinions and actually start acting on them. Why do we assume that is not happening with Pakistani and Muslim blogs?

Sometime ago it was revealed that a widely accessed pro-Jihadi website www.jihadunspun,com was actually run by CIA to help identify Jihadi sympathizers.

So which of the Pakistani bloggers express extreme emotions not because they have these views but rather as a means of “trolling” for others who might be actual extremists? I am sure readers can identify many on the basis of their own suspicions. My own favorite is RupeeNews blogger Moin Ansari who mixes anti-American, anti-Jewish, anti-Indian and anti-everybody rhetoric with his own peculiar mix of sexual innuendo and conspiracy theories. We all know sex sells so if a professional from the intelligence community or law enforcement was helping someone run a blog or website to attract most possible readers and to use that as a technique of drawing up a list of Muslims and Pakistanis with extremist views, a website that mixes sexy headlines with conspiracy theories and hardline ideology could be a likely product.

Now, I have no way of knowing who does or does not work for the agencies and I am not saying that Moin Ansari or RupeeNews are indeed part of the undercover internet-blog strategy of any agency. For all I know, Mr Ansari might just be whatever he claims to be. My only experience with him is that he can dish out a lot of harsh criticism but cannot take any. The last time I posted about him he didn’t take it in good humour or even as me using my right of comment like he does his.

I am just saying that if Moin Ansari was trying to fish out extremists, headlines from RupeeNews.com like  Did Pakistani PM Gillani grope Sherry Rehman?, Kashmala Tariq turns up heat: Bites more than she can chew?, Sex Antics of Mohandas Gandhi: His Failures, Pedophilia, Adultery, Incest, Sexual Perversion & Fetishes, Sex Life of Indira Gandhi of India: The Indian Matahari,  Indira’s tryst with seduction, Wives that slept with Gandhi would be the perfect attractions for angry young Pakistanis living in America ready for jihad.

So, dear readers, start looking at the hardline and angry Pakistani bloggers with a new angle. Are they really expressing their views or are they moles trying to help the Great Satan –and its South Asian satellite–they criticize so much to identify young men who might hate America, Israel and India enough to wage jihad against them?

January 29, 2010

Haqqani: Give Pakistan Armed Drones

The Americans have already pledged to transfer to Pakistan the UAV drone technology to do reconnaissance and intelligence. According to The Nation, Pakistan’s Ambassador to the USA Husain Haqqani is telling the Americans to give Pakistan the armed technology so that Pakistan can target the militants that are attacking us ourselves.

“The government of Pakistan has repeatedly said that we would like to have the capability to be able to identify and take out targets on ground,” Ambassador Husain Haqqani told National Public Radio. Pakistan, he stressed, prefers to do everything on the Pakistani side of the border itself.

“And the reason is very simple: We have a military capability in certain areas and in some areas we lack certain technical capabilities and we would like that technical capabilities for ourselves.”

The Pakistanis are committed to fighting militants in the Afghan border region but it is unfair to characterize Pakistan as a base for al-Qaeda-linked elements, since militants straddle both sides of the porous and challenging border, he clarified.

Haqqani made a very interesting statement also that people are against drone strikes because innocents are sometimes caught in the crossfire. If Pakistan’s military had the technology of armed drones then we would be able to target the militants with our better intelligence and eliminate the problem of innocent deaths while destroying the jihadis.

January 28, 2010

Justice for Shazia Masih, Not Just a Daughter of Christians but also a Daughter of Pakistan

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — admin @ 12:39 pm

The heartbreaking story of 12-year old Shazia Masih should unite all Pakistanis in an effort to ensure something like her brutal murder never happens again.

Before she fell victim to Mohammad Naeem’s beatings and torture, she was prey to the shackles of generational poverty. Her parents needed her to work to keep food on the table, to allow the family to get by. She was already a victim. At the age of 12, she had already working as a maid for eight months at the home of wealthy lawyer Mohammad Naeem. Any dreams she may have had would have seemed like impossible hopes for her.

The job required her to live in Naeem’s house, and her mother was denied chances to see her. When she learned her daughter was admitted to the hospital, she immediately went there…only to learn Shazia had died.

Naeem says she would help herself to food at his house, and she had done this multiple times. What kind of a human being is this man, who would deny a poor child food? He beat her so much so that she had to be taken to a hospital where she died on January 22nd. A postmortem report confirmed the girl had been tortured to death: her body had several marks of wounds of a sharp-edged weapon, her right arm and ribs were fractured, her skull was damaged and her nails have been plucked out.

The police were reluctant to investigate the claims of torture and murder, but CLAAS (a ministry that aids Pakistani Christians) put pressure police by contacting media outlets and bringing attention to this story.

As a country, we cannot continue like this. There is no hope for us if we do. Shazia Masih’s story should ignite a passion in all of us to end the religious divides between us. We are all Pakistanis, we all live in a country the Quaid hoped would be a peaceful land for all to live freely and safely. Shazia is also an example of the harshness of poverty. Our political leaders must take note and work harder than ever before to break the cycle of poverty that robs children of the chance at a better future. Children should not be exploited, should not be made available to human scum like Mohammad Naeem to be beaten, raped, tortured, murdered. We must offer our children a better life than that.

President Zardari has made it his domestic priority to focus on women’s rights and poverty. It is truly heartening to see a leader of our country step up and call out our problems as they are, and not pretend they don’t exist. This is not a political issue, it is a moral one, it is a question of our very decency.

Shazia is gone, but will never be forgotten. For her parents, the world must be a dark, miserable place. Imagine…having to send your child, your young daughter away because of lack of money, only to learn you sent her to her death. We must focus on the key issues here….poverty, child labor, women’s rights.

The country that gave the Muslim world its first and only female leader needs to get back on that track. The Quaid’s Pakistan, Benazir’s Pakistan…they are visions of a country where all citizens, regardless of religion or gender, have a right to improve their lives and live with respect.

We have to remind ourselves of where we want to go, start working in that direction, and never, ever stop.

January 27, 2010

Pakistan and the US Increasing Coordination Against Terror

Filed under: Afghanistan,Defense,hypernationalists,india,Taliban,terrorism,USA — admin @ 7:35 am

Pakistan and the US have tremendously improved coordination with military operations against terrorists.

Those are the sentiments of Admiral Mike Mullen at a meeting this past Monday in Washington, DC. Mullen said all the nations in the region – Afghanistan, Pakistan, India – had to further improve ties and share information. Doing this would encourage diplomatic ties and promote regional security, as all three nations should be carrying out anti-terrorism programs that complement each other. This of course is key in preventing the shuttling of militants back and forth across borders.

This is yet another official calling for greater interaction between Pakistan and her neighbors, and particularly emphasizing the long-term commitments the US has with Pakistan.

The fact is, there are still many in Pakistan who feel the US is completely disinterested in the needs of the Pakistani people and is there for its own needs. They forget, or choose to overlook, the aid packages and substantial investment the American people have made in Pakistan.

Increasingly working with regional authorities and international partners in the fight against terrorism will enable Pakistan to stop the hemorrhaging and stabilize.

It is with that stability our people can thrive…we have to get there!

January 26, 2010

The Real Face of Taliban Butchers

Filed under: Taliban — admin @ 12:14 pm

I found this in my email this morning and thought it should be re-posted for you. An excellent compilation of facts about who the menace called Taliban really is. Does this sound like some group that you want to give appeasements to??? For all the weak-minded apologists for Taliban killers, please understand that if these monsters have their say, you will be the first they hang!

Taliban hanging a man in public

Educate yourself about the Taliban – by Taimur Rahman

We must educate ourselves about what the Taliban represent. Here are some of the laws issued by the Taliban government in Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001.

The Talibanic Laws 1996-2001

1.      ”A denier of veil is an infidel and an unveiled woman is lewd. Conditions of wearing veil”:
2.      The veil must cover the whole body.
3.      Women’s clothes must not be thin.
4.      Women’s clothes must not be decorated and colourful.
5.      Women’s clothes must not be narrow and tight to prevent the seditious limbs
6.      from being noticed. The veil must not be thin.
7.      Women must not perfume themselves. If a perfumed woman passes by a crowd of
8.      men, she is considered to be an adulteress.
9.      Women’s clothes must not resemble men’s clothes.
10.     Muslim women’s clothes must not resemble non-Muslim women’s clothes.
11.     Their foot ornaments must not produce sound.
12.     They must not wear sound-producing garments.
13.     They must not walk in the middle of streets.
14.     They must not go out of their houses without their husband’s permission.
15.     They must not talk to strange men.
16.     If it is necessary to talk, they must talk in a low voice and without laughter.
17.     They must not look at strangers.
18.     They must not mix with strangers.”
19.     All ground and first floor residential windows should be painted over or screened to prevent women being visible from the street. A Taliban representative explained that “the face of a woman is a source of corruption for men who are not related to them”.
20.     The photographing or filming of women was banned as was displaying pictures of females in newspapers, books, shops or the home.
21.     The modification of any place names that included the word “women.” For example, “women’s garden” was renamed “spring garden”.
22.     Women were forbidden to appear on the balconies of their apartments or houses.
23.     Ban on women’s presence on radio, television or at public gatherings of any kind.
24.     Ban on women riding bicycles or motorcycles, even with their mahrams.
25.     Women were forbidden from riding in a taxi without a mahram.
26.     Segregated bus services introduced to prevent males and females traveling on the same bus.
27.     Are forbidden to work outside the home. On September 30th 1996 the Taliban decreed that all women should be banned from employment. Some 25 percent of government employees were female. All lost their employment. Elementary education of children, not just girls, was shut down in Kabul, where virtually all of the elementary school teachers were women.
28.     Are banned from studying in schools or universities.
29.     Are not allowed to gather for any recreational purposes.
30.     Are prohibited from practicing family planning.
31.     Cannot be treated by male doctors.
32.     Cannot be operated upon by a surgical team containing a male member.
33.     Are banned from playing sports or entering a sport center or club.
34.     Have no legal recourse. A woman cannot petition the court directly; her testimony is worth half a man’s testimony.
35.     Are publicly stoned and sometimes executed if accused of having sex outside of marriage.
36.     Are forbidden to deal with male shopkeepers or talk or shake hands with men outside their families.
37.     Whipping, beating and verbal abuse of women not clothed in accordance with
38.     Taliban rules, or of women unaccompanied by a mahram.
39.     Whipping of women in public for having non-covered ankles.
40.     Public stoning of women accused of having sex outside marriage. (A number of
41.     lovers are stoned to death under this rule).
42.     Ban on women washing clothes next to rivers or in a public place.
43.     Ban on male tailors taking women’s measurements or sewing women’s clothes.
44.     Ban on female public baths.
45.     Ban on flared (wide) pant-legs, even under a burqa.
46.     Banned the watching of movies, television and videos, for everyone.
47.     Banned celebrating the traditional new year (Nowroz) on March 21. The Taliban
48.     has proclaimed the holiday un-Islamic.
49.     Disavowed Labor Day (May 1st), because it is deemed a “communist” holiday.
50.     Ordered that all people with non-Islamic names change them to Islamic ones.
51.     Forced haircuts upon Afghan youth.
52.     Ordered that men wear Islamic clothes and a cap.
53.     Ordered that men not shave or trim their beards, which should grow long enough
54.     to protrude from a fist clasped at the point of the chin.
55.     Ordered that all people attend prayers in mosques five times daily.
56.     Banned the keeping of pigeons and playing with the birds, describing it as
57.     un-Islamic. The violators will be imprisoned and the birds shall be killed. The
58.     kite flying has also been stopped.
59.     Ordered all onlookers, while encouraging the sportsmen, to chant Allah-o-Akbar
60.     (God is great) and refrain from clapping.
61.     Ban on certain games including kite flying which is “un-Islamic” according to
62.     Taliban.
63.     Anyone who carries objectionable literature will be executed.
64.     Anyone who converts from Islam to any other religion will be executed.
65.     All boy students must wear turbans. They say “No turban, no education”.
66.     Non-Muslim minorities must distinct badge or stitch a yellow cloth onto their
67.     dress to be differentiated from the majority Muslim population.
68.     Banned the use of the internet by both ordinary Afghans and foreigners.

Examples of punishments by the Taliban

1.      In October 1996, a woman had the tip of her thumb cut off for wearing nail varnish.
2.      In December 1996, Radio Shari’a announced that 225 Kabul women had been seized and punished for violating the sharia code of dress. The sentence was handed down by a tribunal and the women were lashed on their legs and backs for their misdemeanor.
3.      In March 1997, a married woman, from Laghman Province, was caught attempting to flee the district with another man. The Islamic tribunal found her guilty of adultery and condemned both her and her lover to death by stoning.
4.      In May 1997, 5 female CARE International employees with authorisation from the Ministry of the Interior to conduct research for an emergency feeding programme were forced from their vehicle by members of the religious police. The guards used a public address system to insult and harass the women before striking them with a metal and leather whip over 1.5 meters (almost 5 feet) in length.
5.      In 1999, a mother of seven was executed in front of 30,000 spectators in Kabul’s Ghazi Sport stadium for the murder of her abusive husband. She was imprisoned for 3 years and extensively tortured prior to the execution.
6.      When a Taliban raid discovered a woman running an informal school in her apartment, they beat the children; threw her down a flight of stairs causing her to break her leg; and then imprisoned her. They threatened to publicly stone her family if she didn’t sign a declaration of loyalty to the Taliban and its laws.

The legacy of nearly a decade of fundamentalist rule

1.      Up to now, nearly 79% of Afghan women cannot read nor write.
2.      Maternal mortality rates stood at the highest in the world with nearly 1,900 deaths per 100,000 live births. It is the singular achievement of the Taliban that they managed to reach the highest rate of maternal deaths ever recorded in history in the province of Badakshan: 6,500 deaths per 100,000 births!
3.      Up to 2004, UNICEF recorded more than 26 attacks against girl’s schools.
4.      Enrollment as of 2004 still was at the dismal figure of 9% due to Taliban attacks, propaganda and assassinations of teachers.
5.      57% of women are married off before the age of 16
6.      72% do not know of any form of contraception, nor any way of delaying pregnancy.
7.      Even during conducting the sham elections, registration of women voters recorded the lowest levels in the south of the country: Zabul (9%), Helmand (12%) and Kandahar (27%): precisely the areas that were, and now have again, fallen under Taliban control.
8.      97 percent of women surveyed show symptoms of major depression.
9.      3/4 of the women say their health had declined.
10.     Opium is being taken by the women to ease the pain from inadequate health care.

January 25, 2010

Conspiracy theorist Ahmed Quraishi resurfaces with new hypocrisy

Master Conspiracy theorist Ahmed Quraishi is back – one had not heard from him in a few months making one wonder if he had changed his principal occupation. After all, he has tried in the past to be an employee of Voice of America (VOA) and has also been a member of the American Political Consultants Association –both facts reported with full references by www.pakistanmediawatch.com

In his latest piece Ahmed Quraishi once again attempts to pit Pakistan against the United States, intentionally or inadvertently benefiting Pakistan’s real nemesis – India. He does so by bundling together unconnected stuff into an emotional argument without any citation of sources or proper facts.

Quraishi claims for the umpteenth time that there is a huge American conspiracy against Pakistan. Unlike what Quraishi and others like him are attempting to spin US Defense Secretary Robert Gates never “admitted” in any interview that Blackwater was operating in Pakistan. In reply to a question on whether private US security contractors were working in Pakistan all that Secretary Gates said was that security contractors were indeed operating in Pakistan and the US government would ensure that they abide by Pakistan’s laws.

What Ahmed Quraishi fails to mention is that these contractors – especially DynCorp – have been in Pakistan since Musharraf’s time. Musharraf, in case anyone forgets, was the object of admiration of people like Ahmed Quraishi who have been yearning for a military takeover of the kind that brought Musharraf to power in 1999.

As an all powerful, patriotism defining general, Musharraf is a ‘favorite’ of anti-democrats like Ahmed Quraishi and so Quraishi forgives or ignores all of Musharraf’s actions, focusing exclusively in creating hatred against elected Pakistani leaders and the United States. During Musharraf’s regime Ahmed Quraishi used to accuse everyone – lawyers, media, civil society – of being American agents while clarifying that Musharraf was pursuing an ‘independent foreign policy.’ What he – and others like him – never discussed then was that DynCorp International, a United States-based private military contractor (PMC) and aircraft maintenance company, was allowed by the Musharraf government to enter and work in Pakistan.

What the current civilian government is doing by allowing DynCorp to stay in Pakistan is only a continuation of international agreements undertaken under Musharraf. It is diffuclt to understand how even after allowing DynCorp to operate in Pakistan Musharraf followed an ‘independent foreign policy’ in Ahmed Quraishi’s eyes but by allowing DynCorp to stay the civilian government is kowtowing to Americans?

Mr Quraishi must explain this inherent contradiction in his argument – that is if there is any argument at all. Or is his real problem with elected, civilian rule whereas a dictatorship ruling with the help of secret services is the ideal of the anti-democrats.

Most of Quraishi’s article is a rant against the American media and think tank world for their supposedly anti-Pakistan views and lack of understanding of Pakistan’s security concerns. However, both the American media and the policy world are an assorted group and you find diverse views on every topic, not just US-Pakistan relations. There are pro-Pakistan voices in the U.S. too, which Pakistanis should cultivate rather than drive all Americans away and create more enemies for our country.

Also if Ahmed Quraishi can talk about Pakistan’s security and foreign interests from ‘a Pakistani angle’ why should the American media not discuss US foreign policy issues from an American angle? Why deny to others what you arrogate to yourself?

As always while attacking the American media and think tank world Ahmed Quraishi fails to mention that he had applied for a job with Voice of America and that he is a member of the American Association of Political Consultants.

The ‘senior Pakistani journalist’ Talat Hussain whom Ahmed Quraishi cites as someone ‘who is in the know of things’ is the same person who during Secretary Clinton’s visit to Pakistan in October 2009 made a “$640 million mistake” by wrongly citing how much aid U.S. gives to Kyrgyzstan. Also, Talat Hussain once worked for CNN and Time Magazine while his brother Riffat Hussain has worked in US think tanks but that does not disqualify them from being super-patriots while Talat Hussain (as quoted by Ahmed Quraishi) pokes fun at all those Pakistani journalists and civil society leaders who oppose the Taliban and seek good relations with the U.S.

What hypocrisy !!!

January 24, 2010

Negotiating With Taliban Is Suicide

Filed under: Taliban — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 2:26 pm
Taliban butchers looking for innocents to murder

Taliban butchers looking for innocents to murder

Despite the fact that these butchers continue to murder innocents, some people are still asking if there can be some deal made to appease the TTP killers. They think that people who kill schoolchildren and make bomb attacks in a market are only wishing for an offer of chai and biscuits. But this is not the case. What Taliban want is to topple the government and take complete power for themselves.

Even though many of the popular media personalities are cowering and rushing over each other to prostrate themselves before Hakimullah Mehsud and his band of bloody butchers, there are actually some people who have the courage to speak the truth about these killers.

The following column by Irfain Husain is one of the best explanations of what the Taliban want, and why making some deal to give them what they want would be suicide for Pakistan.

(more…)

January 23, 2010

Pakistan to Receive Drone Technology From USA

Shadow Drone UAV

Chinese news Xinhua is reporting that USA is giving drone technology to Pakistan:

The United States will supply drone aircraft to Pakistan which will significantly enhance the country’s surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, visiting U. S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Friday. Talking to reporters in Islamabad, Gates said that 12 RQ-7 Shadow unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will be part of one billion dollar allocation for Pakistan from its Coalition Support Fund.

He said weapons and equipment will also be provided to Pakistan for the war against terrorism.

In addition, the American Defense Secretary has said that the US will soon make a payment of $500 Million to support Pakistan’s military:

Gates also said the U.S. will soon make a payment of 500 million dollars from the Coalition Support Fund to reimburse Pakistan for its expenses in the war on terror.

This drone technology is far advanced of what Pakistan currently has and will allow for much improved intelligence gathering and reconnaissance against TTP militants, India, and any other aggressors who think that they can encroach on Pakistan’s territory.

President Zardari has been calling on the Americans to transfer drone technology to Pakistan for some time. While this is not the armed drone that is used to launch missiles against militants, it is a great step forward and shows that the Americans are working with us to defend our national security. Surely if we continue to show our military excellence – our military that the Americans are praising as an important partner.

Building this partnership will have two important results. First, it will strengthen our military access to advanced technologies like drones. Second, it will send a clear message to belligerents like Deepak Kapoor.

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates with Army Chief Gen. Kayani

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates with Army Chief Gen. Kayani

January 22, 2010

USA Secretary of Defense Pledges Faithfulness to Pakistan

USA Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

USA Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

USA Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has pledged faithfulness to a partnership with Pakistan in comments to military officers today. The following report is from Dawn newspaper:

The United States has no designs on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons or ”a single inch of Pakistani soil,” US Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Pakistani military officers Friday, adding that fighting terrorists along the Afghan border is in Pakistan’s interest as well as Washington’s.”We have enemies in common along the border, but we also have many other interests in common,” Gates said, and the Pakistani military has choices to make about its resources and focus just as the US armed forces have done.

Addressing the legacy of mistrust and what he called an ”organized propaganda campaign” to misrepresent US intentions, Gates used carefully calibrated phrasing to tick off some of the allegations against the United States in wide circulation in Pakistan.

”I fully understand why some of you may be skeptical about the US commitment to Pakistan,” Gates told officers at Pakistan’s National Defense University.

Many in his audience came of professional age in the 1990s, when the United States had cut off military ties to Pakistan and largely ignored the growth of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

The United States wants Pakistan to take on Taliban militants who use its territory as a refuge, but Gates’ rhetoric on the subject during two days of talks in the Pakistani capital was notably mild.

He said he was deeply impressed with Pakistan’s military offensive against militants within its borders.

”The leadership will make the decisions” about when or whether they are going to do something. ”That’s just fine with me,” Gates said during an interview with Pakistani and US journalists.

Asked whether the US was winning in the long battle against al Qaeda terrorism, Gates said the United States has made progress but hasn’t won yet. He said al Qaeda and what he calls a syndicate of affiliated groups are less capable of large-scale, coordinated attacks than they once were and in many cases their leadership has been killed or captured.

The Obama administration has taken a softer tone with Pakistan in recent months, praising the country’s unprecedented assault on militants inside its borders and dropping public appeals for Pakistan to focus on the militants along its western border.

In his speech to military officers, Gates said the US seeks no military bases in the country and has no desire to control Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

”The United States does not covet a single inch of Pakistani soil,” Gates said.

In meetings Thursday with Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, the country’s army chief and others, Gates called the antiterror operations a success so far, ”and he acknowledged to all of them that we realize that has come with a great deal of sacrifice for the military,” Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said following the sessions.

”We are not trying to prescribe a timeline by which they must do things,” Morrell said.

The Pakistani army said Thursday it cannot expand its offensive against militants for at least six months, after time to consolidate gains made against militants who primarily target Pakistan. Remarks from the Army’s chief spokesman did not rule out the offensive that would more directly benefit the United States.

”We are not talking years,” Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas told reporters traveling with Gates. ”Six months to a year” would be needed before Pakistan could consolidate the gains it has made against militants in other parts of the country and then consider going farther, he said.

January 21, 2010

Is Pakistan an Elite Nation?

There is no secret that India is meddling and trying to destabilize Pakistan. This has been well documented. It is also no secret that India is trying to isolate Pakistan by driving a wedge between us and global powers like the USA and UK. The Daily Times published an editorial earlier this week that discusses the US’s India tilt, but they have taken the wrong lesson from events and are playing into the hands of India by acting indirectly as Indian ‘Trojan Horses.’

The editors of The Daily Times conclude that the US attitude is not helpful. But they are looking at the relationship incorrectly. If the US attitude is not helpful to Pakistan, it is because the US does not see helping Pakistan as being in their interest. The US does not have a helpful attitude towards India because of some secret love affair. Rather, they believe that India is a rising power and that it is in their interest to make a close relationship between the two nations.

It perceives India to be an emerging power and is strongly biased towards developing a strong strategic relationship with it. The US has pledged special concessions to India for transfer of nuclear technology, ostensibly for peaceful purposes, but this has raised legitimate concerns in various quarters about the space this allows for enhanced weapons production.

This is exactly the point. The US is trying to build a strong relationship with India because “it perceives India to be an emerging power.” I was reminded of the above paragraph this morning when I read Syed Talat Hussain’s column in today’s Daily Times. Mr. Hussain takes the correct lesson from dealing with the US – when dealing with a world superpower, we must go to them with heads held up as equals, not having an inferiority complex.

Much of this bilateral mess would not have been created had we been clear and forthright in dealing with Washington and if we had worked out the minutest detail of every part of our support to the US, not just in monetary terms but also procedurally, and then inked a proper, honest and honourable agreement and made it public. Instead, we chose the wrong path and, regrettably, continued on it even after the administration changed in Washington. Even today we see piecemeal agreements with the US as sufficient grounds for cooperation and building a mutually beneficial relationship. And when it comes to our defence arrangement with Washington, even a self-contained document is lacking that could offer a broad insight into this important realm.

There are some who say that Pakistan should not have any dealing with the USA and should isolate ourselves from the rest of the world. This is pure rubbish. Pakistan belongs in the community of elite nations. We are the 6th most populous nation in the world, our GDP is in the top 26% of the world’s nations, and we are one of only nine nations in the world that is a nuclear power. So why is it that some individuals continue to say that we should not be having mutually beneficial relationships with the other world powers?

USA is not going to be our rich uncle Sam. But it will be our partner in the business of national and economic security if we will only learn to have the pride to act as an equal. The US is able to negotiate its deals and make its relationships because it is a world power. By rights, Pakistan is also a world power (this is explained in the previous paragraph). Just as US, Russia, China, and yes even India have relationships that benefit each other, so Pakistan should be part of this group also.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress