Bismillah ar Rahman ar Rahim REALPakNationalists

December 31, 2009

A New Year beckons!

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 9:04 am

A New Year beckons!

I see twelve months before me, a true tableu rosa. As yet, it is blank from non-issues ranted my media pundits, free from devastating terrorist attacks. Right now, it is a year that promises us many great things.

One can only pray and work towards certain goals…here is my prayer for Pakistan for the year 2010.

May the New Year prove to detractors of democracy and the international community that a sustained, flourishing (democratically-elected!) government can exist in Pakistan. May the New Year bring unity to all the political parties, and may noble principles trump shoddy politics. May our resolve in the face of terror never waver, but strengthen until we triumph and take our country back. May we all stand united against senseless murders, assassination and sectarian rioting.

May our people realize the beauty and potential they have and strive to unlock their individual talents. May the curiosity of our children be rewarded with education and opportunity, not poverty and misery. May Pakistan rise to all her challenges and persevere through the darkest hour.

This is our country, it is our duty to care for it, nurture it, and cultivate the talent within.

December 29, 2009

Stopping Sectarian Violence

Filed under: Defense,hypernationalists,Taliban — Tags: , — admin @ 11:45 am

Terrorism is today’s fight. Will Sectarian Violence be tomorrow’s?

We cannot allow that to happen. We are a strong nation that has broken free from military dictatorships and martial law. We are working hard at extinguishing the threat of extremism, and insha’Allah we will triumph. We must give the next generation a stable country they can grow up in, be educated in, and find success in. We cannot leave them sectarian issues to contend with.

A nation whose beloved founder was a Shia should not have these suicide attacks. A nation built on ideals of tolerance and religious freedom should not exist to hateful and fragmented.

As the diverse city of Karachi reels from the massacre, Pakistanis must remember the actions of the other marchers and passer-by at the time of the attack: they picked up stones and hurled them towards the bomber. That swift action is symbolic and should not be lost in the shuffle.

We must unite against this and stop it before it becomes the headline of the future.

December 28, 2009

Attack on Ashura an Attack on Pakistan

 

Taliban bombs Ashura procession in Karachi

Taliban bombs Ashura procession in Karachi

Cowardly Taliban bombers have attacked the Ashura procession in Karachi, killing 20 people and injuring at least 40 more. This is an act of war on Pakistan by Taliban militants coming only days after these same try to say they want to have ‘talks.’ How can there be talks with such butchers of innocent Pakistanis? How can these animals commit the murder of innocent Muslims on one day and then expect us to believe them when they say they are not against us?

Do not misunderstand. This is no sectarian war. This has nothing to do with Sunni or Shia or any other religious sect. Only it is meant to sow hatred and violence. Taliban and its associated militant groups like Sipah-e-Sahaba and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi are trying to turn Pakistan into a land of sectarian violence like what erupted in Iraq after Saddam Hussein.

But Pakistan is stronger than this. Pakistan was born as a land where Muslims could practice their religion. Actually, Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah was Shia. So this attack on an Ashura procession in Karachi is not only an attack on those innocents, it is a direct attack on Quaid-i-Azam. It is a direct attack on the essence of Pakistan.

For Taliban or any other group to murder innocent Muslims for doing exactly this has no excuse. This is an act of war on Pakistan and must be met with full military retaliation against these groups. National security agencies like ISI and and MI should be rooting out not only the leaders of these groups but the mindless foot soldiers that are taking their orders and committing such acts of barbarity.

December 26, 2009

No Talks With Butchers

TTP has expressed willingness to engage in talks but only with Imran Khan. This is same TTP that has been bombing schools, GHQ, and markets during Eid shopping. This is same TTP that butchers innocent Pakistanis as they go about their business in their own country. Every day they are murdering our people. Now they want to have us for tea? We say ‘No Talks With Butchers.’

The news report of TTP’s interest in talking with Imran Khan is especially intriguing because why would they not want talks with PML-N? This is the center-right party that has always been friendly with religious groups. Also they are not even asking for talks with JI who is their natural ally. Why announce that they want to negotiate with Khan? Perhaps they are only seeking his autograph.

Whatever the TTP say is a lie. When there have been deals made in the past, TTP was always quick to cheat the deal and make futher attacks. This is a classic guerilla tactic. Negotiate some peace deal, then make attacks when the defenses are down. We have fallen for this tactic before, but we will not be caught off guard again. Nooruddin Muhammad says he will make peace in Malakand Division, but we do not need his lies. Peace will be made in Malakand Division when TTP is removed forever.

TTP can try all they might to meet Imran Khan. They can even have an autograph. But negotiations with the people who are killing our people is not a question. Even Fazl ur Rehman has said there is no question of talks with Taliban. No talks with butchers.

December 24, 2009

Adm. Mullen: Pakistani Military Achievements 'Remarkable'

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 7:26 am

 

Gen. Kayani and American Adm. Mullen

Gen. Kayani and American Adm. Mullen

The American military chief has continued his praise for Paksitan’s military this week, saying that our military’s achievements were ‘remarkable’ and that our military does not get enough praise for the hard work and successes that we have accomplished.

Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has said that Pakistan does not get enough credit for its role in the war against extremists although some of its achievements were ‘pretty extraordinary’.

The American military chief also had words for those who criticise Pakistan’s fight against militants, perhaps sending a reminder to those who are prone to say that we should ‘do more’ that what we are doing is quite extraordinary already.

‘Too many people eagerly and easily criticise Pakistan for what they haven’t done, and when I go to Swat and look at what they did there on the military side I think it’s pretty extraordinary,’ said the US military chief while talking to journalists on Sunday.

A report released on Monday by the American Forces Press Service, noted that last week Pakistani authorities arranged for Admiral Mullen to visit Swat and showed him the areas they had retaken from the Taliban.

‘Swat was in danger, and the Taliban began moving even closer to the Pakistani capital. Admiral Mullen’s visit there showed that the Pakistani military has done a good job of counter-insurgency. The army cleared the valley and is holding it,’ the report noted.

It quoted Admiral Mullen as saying that while Pakistan’s job in Swat was not complete yet, what Pakistanis had achieved so far was remarkable.

The report in Dawn went on to describe the friendly relationship between the American military command and Pakistan’s military. This is above all a natural result of the partnership and close ties that our military has enjoyed with the Americans, as well as the current security situation in which we are fighting a common enemy that is the jihadi militants.

The report noted that more than most US officials, Admiral Mullen had a cordial and long-standing relationship with the Pakistani military.

The report pointed out that Admiral Mullen ‘advises patience and humility’ in dealing with Pakistan, a view not shared by some leading Republicans in Congress.

Separately, the Pentagon reported that Admiral Mullen signed guidelines for the US military for 2010, which goes to members of the Joint Staff and informs the joint force.

Al-Qaeda and similar terrorist groups remained the biggest threat to the United States, the admiral wrote in the guidance. ‘The threat is still real,’ he said. Defeating those groups will take more than military power, and the admiral called on the US military to work with other national agencies and international allies to take on the threat.

President Obama’s strategy has the goal of defeating Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan and to prevent the group from threatening America and its allies, he noted.

‘Our main effort now must be to push forces into the theatre as quickly as possible – including shifting the balance of enablers from Iraq,’ the admiral wrote. The enablers include such things as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets, engineers, military police and civil affairs personnel.

All aspects of the joint force needed to act more quickly, he said, urging the Defence Department and the combatant commands to send their very best people to fight the wars.

December 23, 2009

Anti-Americanism and the Future of Pakistan

Hypernationalist anti-Americanism is a dangerous path for the nation's future.

Hypernationalist anti-Americanism is a dangerous path for the nation's future.

Anti-Americanism has become quite the trend in much of the country, and this does not hold well for the future. A writer on this blog wrote last week that there were uncomfortable similarities with the political situation in Iran thirty years ago – a reaction against American involvement in the country that popularized a faux-nationalism hijacked by theocratic militants. Renowned defense analyst Ahmad Faruqui notices this as well in his column, Monday’s issue of Dawn, and notes that the conspiracies and anti-Americanism that is being stoked by hypernationalists is not in Pakistan’s interests.

Lost on the anti-Americanistas was the fact that the US was not obliged to provide $7.5bn over the next five years to Pakistan. If the Pakistanis did not like the conditions that came with the funds, they could simply decline the aid. As Senator Kerry put it, the US had plenty of other places on which to spend the money.

When it comes to anti-Americanism, there is little doubt that Al Qaeda and the Taliban lead the pack. But the rightwing parties are not too far behind. At a recent demonstration in Pakistan, bearded men held up placards that flaunted the Yankees in no uncertain terms: ‘Crush, Crush, America.’

But we must ask if this rabid anti-Americanism being promoted by hypernationalists is based in facts. It is easy to come up with wild conspiracy theories, but what happens if you put those same theories to a historical test? Faruqui does just that, and finds some real problems with the theories:

Anti-Americanism has also picked up converts in the mainstream print and electronic media. Conspiracy theories involving America are aired with increasing frequency. Even some leading figures from the diplomatic establishment have joined the fray.

The latest is Shamshad Ahmad, a former foreign secretary and former UN ambassador.

Speaking at a seminar in Karachi on state sovereignty, he went beyond the usual recital of grievances. That well-known list includes three major items. First, the US did not come to Pakistan’s aid during the 1965 war with India. This overlooks the fact that the war was initiated by Pakistan and that US arms were never meant to be used against India.

Second, it did not come to Pakistan’s aid in the 1971 war with India. This overlooks the fact that the war was triggered by the military’s ambitions to negate the results of the general elections and to rule in perpetuity.

Third, it abandoned Pakistan once the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan in 1989. This overlooks the fact that the US had not guaranteed Pakistan’s security for all times to come against enemies of all stripes.

The former foreign secretary, a strong proponent of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons but by no means a firebrand Islamist, stated: ‘The US had used us as a spy in the past to fulfil its motives, while now it is using us as a mercenary.’ And then came the clincher: ‘It is the US intervention, not the Russian intervention which has kept everything on the boil in the region.’

Some political analysts continue to indulge in conspiracy theories about the attack on Pearl Harbour on Dec 7, 1941 and the attacks of Sept 11, 2001. But Ahmad put himself in a class of one by saying that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan on Christmas Eve in 1979 was engineered by the US.

He said, ‘The Americans think and plan about things they want to achieve in 50 or 60 years. They created a vacuum in Afghanistan. So after the political manoeuvring in Afghanistan, the US created a way for the Soviet Union [to be] sucked in[to] that vacuum.’

The former senior diplomat, who knows the country’s history better than most, went on to say that the Americans got the Pakistanis on their side by saying that the Soviets were out to fulfil the czarist dream of building a warm water port. This is revisionist history. Right after the Soviet invasion, Gen Ziaul Haq put in a plea for the West’s help, saying that the Evil Empire was about to make a run for Gwadar. He famously rejected President Jimmy Carter’s $400m aid package by calling it peanuts. But when President Ronald Reagan offered him a $3.2bn package, he was all smiles.

These are the historical inaccuracies of a former foreign secretary. Someone who should know better. But the fantasies that are flying around discussion boards and drawing rooms across the country are even more outrageous.

An ultranationalist theory that is rapidly gaining currency in Pakistan is that there was peace in the region until the US arrived in October 2001. Several of the ultranationalists also subscribe to four ‘booster’ theories. Namely, that all of our problems are a result of the Americans.

First, that the US engineered the 9/11 attacks on itself. It needed an excuse to invade Afghanistan and control access to Central Asian natural gas. Second, that Osama bin Laden did not carry out the 9/11 attacks, that he is an American agent trained and armed by the CIA and that he was killed in December 2001. Third, that Al Qaeda does not exist. And fourth, that the Taliban are simply freedom-loving people trying to free their country from foreign occupation. The obvious theory about 9/11 has no vocal adherents in Pakistan. This argues that the attacks were carried out to draw the US into the region, inflame interfaith relations and provoke a holy war that would result in the revival of the caliphate.

This sort of thinking not only ignores the past, but imperils our future. Recall the words of Lt. Gen (retd) Talat Masood and his explanation of why anti-Americanism is a danger to our national defense. Faruqui picks up this same theme in his closing arguments for his column in Dawn:

With every passing week, Pakistan continues to inch towards the brink. Given the frequency of the Muslim-on-Muslim attacks that are now being mounted, it is moot whether Pakistan is a failing state or a failed state. Neither prognosis is good.

The US is not perfect. It has made its share of mistakes, domestically and internationally. A common charge levied by the anti-Americanistas is that the US acts in its own interests. That should be cause for celebration and not denigration. If only Pakistan would do the same. Instead of demonising America, it should turn on its own demons.

This rabid anti-Americanism is a danger to the future of Pakistan. The Iranians also thought that following the words of hypernationalist theocrats would save their nation. Instead, it set them back decades, and still today they are struggling to remove the suffocating regime. Once the militants take control, there is no more confusion about who is the real enemy of the people.

The Americans have made many mistakes, but they have also stood by Pakistan in the past. Today, they appear to be making real attempts at building a partnership with us. To suggest that we turn our backs on them and join hands with the hypernationalists is suicide. After all, there can be no argument that it was Americans who beat to death protestors of the Iranian regime. Inshallah we will not find ourselves in a similar future.

December 22, 2009

An Existential Threat

The following column by retired Ambassador Javid Husain was first published in The Nation on December 22.

The monster of terrorism stalks the land from one corner to the other posing an existential threat to the nation. Hardly a day passes without a terrorist incident taking place in some part of the country resulting in the loss of innocent lives and causing material destruction. Security establishments, mosques and markets have been the target of this madness. It seems that nothing is safe from the hands of the terrorists who pose a serious threat to the security and economic well being of the nation. The need of the hour is to face and overcome this challenge which otherwise has the potential to tear apart the social fabric of our nation. This would require an objective and dispassionate analysis of the genesis of this threat, the formulation of a comprehensive strategy to eradicate it and the resoluteness of purpose on the part of the nation and the government to implement this strategy.

A successful strategy to overcome the evil of terrorism requires in the first place an understanding of the factors which gave birth to it. After all, terrorism is relatively speaking a new phenomenon in Pakistan’s history. The country was more or less free of this evil till 1990′s when it became the victim of sectarian terrorism. I cannot recall terrorist incidents now causing so much pain and sorrow to us taking place in the country with such ferocity or frequency even in 1980′s when we were deeply involved in supporting the Afghan jihad against the Soviet occupation. 

The problem of terrorism, from which we are suffering now, took roots after the withdrawal of the Red Army from Afghanistan and the commencement of the civil war in Afghanistan between the Pashtuns and the non-Pashtuns after the fall of the Soviet-installed Najibullah regime in Kabul in 1992. Ideally, Pakistan, Iran and other regional countries should have steered clear of this civil war and allowed the Afghan people to decide their destiny without external interference. Unfortunately, that did not happen either because the political leadership in Pakistan and Iran lacked the requisite sagacity and farsightedness or because their security agencies, which were guided by short-term considerations and the goal of military gains instead of a political settlement in Afghanistan, became so powerful that they were able to defy the political leadership. Pakistan extended its support to the Pashtuns led initially by Gulbadin Hikmatyar and later the Taliban despite their retrogressive character while Iran aligned itself on the side of the non-Pashtuns led mainly by the Northern Alliance in the see-saw struggle for power in Afghanistan which continues till today. Unfortunately, Al-Qaeda was able to entrench itself in Afghanistan during the Taliban rule. The present political dispensation, particularly the composition of the security forces in Afghanistan, established after the fall of the Taliban regime in the aftermath of 9/11 when Pakistan decided to support the US invasion of Afghanistan, by far favours the non-Pashtuns and is the real cause of the deep and widespread dissatisfaction felt by the Pashtuns. It also underlies the continued Taliban insurgency and the conflict between the Pashtuns and non-Pashtuns in Afghanistan. A peace settlement between the two warring sides together with the withdrawal of the foreign forces is, therefore, an essential pre-requisite for durable peace in Afghanistan.

Pakistan became the target of the current tidal wave of terrorism after it tried, under the American pressure, to deny sanctuary in its tribal areas to the Taliban/Afghan Pashtuns fighting the US forces and particularly after it tried to stop its Pashtun tribesmen from going to the support of their brethren in Afghanistan. The fury of the Pashtuns in Afghanistan and in our tribal areas which was to be directed against the coalition forces has instead been aimed now at the military and civilian targets in Pakistan. Thus, the presence of the US forces in Afghanistan and their efforts to bludgeon the Pashtuns in that country into submission in total disregard of their justified political aspirations and cultural sensitivities have not only destabilised our tribal areas but also pose a serious threat to the peace and security of the rest of the country.

In a nutshell, the current tidal wave of terrorism in Pakistan can be ascribed to the following factors. Firstly, it can be attributed to our willingness, for a variety of reasons, to tolerate the continued existence on our soil of the ideological and training infrastructure which had been created initially for supporting the Afghan jihad against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Secondly, it is the logical outcome of our policy of involvement in the civil war in Afghanistan and our ill-conceived and short-sighted policy of support to the retrogressive Taliban regime in 1990′s despite regional and international isolation. The current wave of religious extremism and terrorism in Pakistan is the blowback effect of those flawed policies. Thirdly, we have become the victim of terrorism because of our meek surrender in the face of the US demands to “do more” militarily without impressing upon the Americans the imperative of combining the use of military force against Al-Qaeda and other terrorist elements with political initiatives to engage moderate Taliban elements and promote a peace settlement in Afghanistan.

A comprehensive strategy to overcome the menace of terrorism must be based on a judicious combination of the use of force and political initiatives. The first and foremost element of this strategy should be the dismantlement of the ideological and training infrastructure which we inherited from the days of the Afghan jihad against the Soviets. This infrastructure now poses a serious threat to Pakistan’s internal and external security. Secondly, we should abide by a policy of non-interference in Afghanistan’s internal affairs and support efforts to promote national reconciliation and a peace settlement in Afghanistan free from outside interference. Other neighbours of Afghanistan must be encouraged to follow similar policies. Thirdly, Washington must be advised to combine the use of force against terrorists with political initiatives aimed at promoting a just peace settlement in Afghanistan with the promise of the early withdrawal of its troops from that country. Fourthly, we should engage the moderate elements among the Pakistani Taliban politically to isolate and overcome the extremists within them while continuing the fight against the terrorists who refuse to lay down arms. In view of the cross-border links between the tribes in Afghanistan and those in Pakistan, the chances of success of the political initiatives by the US and Pakistan will improve if they are taken simultaneously. Fifthly, we must revamp our intelligence agencies which so far have failed miserably to do their job of identifying, infiltrating and eliminating the terrorist cells in different parts of the country. Finally, the nation and the government must promote the Islamic principles of tolerance and moderation in our society. This is the demand of the nation’s internal and external security as well as of its economic progress and well being.

December 21, 2009

The need for a “Unity Act”

Filed under: NRO — admin @ 7:38 am

“The darkest night brings the brightest dawn.”

Pakistani politics has become something of a shouting match. Accusations are hurled from every corner, charges of corruption and cronyism are everywhere. Indeed, our political reality is saturated with spite as the seemingly endless blame-game continues.

But it need not continue.

Though Pakistan has had a turbulent history, it is nothing we cannot overcome. Though we have dealt with the violence of fundamentalists and the horrors of military dictatorships, it is nothing we cannot draw strength from. With firm resolve fueled by hope, we can help Pakistan reach its full potential.

But it needs to start somewhere. And that place is the political scene. A glance at the headlines over the past few days will demonstrate just how slanted the opinions towards the Zardari administration and PPP have become. Go back in time and one will see the PPP being welcomed by the media, heralded as the bringers of democracy. Go further back and you will see the rise and fall of other political parties, PML-N and PML-Q. Go into regional politics and you will find local parties sharing a similar fate. It is something of a staple, is it not? A political leader or party enters the scene, tries to get its agenda through (either good or bad!) and then is felled by incriminations, rightly or wrongly.

Look at what that has gotten us! An acrimonious atmosphere serving as a caustic distraction and keeping the federal government from doing its job. What can be done about this?

Let us take a look through history.

In post-apartheid South Africa, it became clear to many that a national soul-cleansing would do the country well. Thus, in 1995 the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act was passed. It was a chance for the oppressor and the oppressed to come forward, confess and testify to their ordeal, and ask for amnesty and dignity. It was, as it was meant to be, a national regrouping, a coming together to finally put the past to rest yet learn from it as South Africa progressed.

Pakistan would greatly benefit from such an act.  There is no party without its fair share of mistakes, mishaps, and blunders. There is no demographic that does not feel frustration at government’s inability to improve the general quality of life.

So why not have our own national-soul cleansing? I propose the Unity Act.

It would bring all political parties together and smooth over past grudges. All parties must then agree to respectfully disagree in the future.

It would allow the nonsense of partisan hacks to fade away and allow the people in power to get back to the jobs they were voted in to be doing!

It would most importantly allow the Pakistani public a chance to see that government is there for them.

For a moment, there could be peace and in that peace there would be a just hope. Let us come together and put the past in the past. A new day beckons.

December 18, 2009

Attacks Will Never Diminish Our Resolve

Filed under: Defense — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 2:36 pm

For the second time n two weeks, a mosque used by Pakistani security forces has been attacked. Ten people are confirmed dead.

They had been praying Jum’ah namaaz.

This once again goes to show there is no logic in the war against extremism. We are dealing with an ideology that demands cold-hearted murder of anyone who wants freedom and harmony. Our enemy is spiteful, vicious and will not hesitate to kill fellow Pakistanis.

Innocent men, women and children have been dying at the hands of these monsters for years. We are now at a point where the federal government has pledged all possible resources to fighting these extremists. We see efforts and bravery by our military and civilian population. We see small victories when Pakistani villagers step up against the evil pervading their lives and fight back. We see large victories by our resilient army, as they demonstrate success in their undertaken offensive.

We are all Pakistanis, and we are committed to security and peace for our nation.

The people who died today will add to the astronomical figure of Pakistanis killed at the hands of extremists. With all the suicide bombings and attacks, it is perhaps easy to become desensitized but that would be an insult to the dead.

With every suicide bombing and attack, our resolve must become stronger and our unity ever more solid.

Adm. Mullen Praises Pakistan Army's War Plan

Filed under: Defense,USA — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 12:36 pm
Gen. Kayani with American Military Chief Adm. Mullen

Gen. Kayani with American Military Chief Adm. Mullen

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen said he “couldn’t give the Pakistani Army anything but an ‘A’” for how they’ve conducted their battle so far, after eight-months-plus of fighting to clear militants from the Swat Valley. He was speaking to those of us traveling with him, after he spent the day touring the now-conquered Swat Valley with Pakistan’s Chief of Staff General Ashfaq Kayani . (For the record, after so many visits with U.S. and Pakistani military officials and diplomats in Afghanistan and Pakistan over the last few days, he looked worn. But so did we.)

“He planned well, and he’s been very deliberate about how much he can get done and when he can get it done,” Mullen said. “I think that’s a very realistic approach to the operations.”

He said that includes how the Pakistani military is currently conducting their counterinsurgency campaign there—trying to boost economic and political development there, after taking that territory. That’s a new way of fighting for the Pakistani army, and one many U.S. military analysts and officers had publicly doubted they could pull off.

Mullen’s comments are also unexpectedly high praise from American’s top military commander in uniform — at a time when U.S. officials are often quoted in the media saying Pakistan is not doing enough to fight the Afghan Taliban, which threatens U.S. troops across the border in Afghanistan. The Pakistani army continues to fight the militants, but they’re concentrating on the Pakistani Taliban, who have waged a deadly suicide bombing campaign in their country, and bypassed areas populated by some of America’s enemies.

You could cynically say Mullen’s warm comments are good preparation to soften the Pakistani leadership up, before asking them to do more. But Mullen is a known for being more matter of fact than manipulative. And he’s not known for being overzealous in handing out praise.

His staff explained he really thinks the Pakistani army in general, and Kayani in particular “get it.” “They’re a learning force,” one official said. They learned the hard way, by taking hundreds of casualties early in this campaign, and finding out that if you don’t hold territory after you take it from the Taliban, you just have to take it again, and lose more troops in the process.

And as the U.S. military learned in Iraq, the official explained, they’ve also learned that it’s easier to “clear and hold” the first part of counterinsurgency, than it is to “build and transfer”—as in building hospitals, schools, roads, and bringing in jobs and business, and then transferring the area to a stable government and security force.

Admiral Mullen said it’s something Kayani and his military commanders brought up a lot in their tour today – that while they’d conquered much of the territory they’d gone after, the economic aid and support from their own government and the international community wasn’t coming in fast enough to both get people back to work, and keep them satisfied enough to keep them from supporting the Taliban again.

“That’s something he is concerned about,” Mullen said. “He has got to hold this territory, until the building starts. So that’s where his main focus is.”

Mullen is taking that message back to Washington – what is essentially a polite pushback from the Pakistani military that they are fighting as hard as they can, as fast as they can, but they’re taking care of their own business, and their own direct enemies – the militant groups responsible for a string of bloody bombings across Pakistan—before they go after America’s enemies.

That said, the admiral said he did bring up Washington’s desire that Pakistan pursue the Afghan Taliban, aka Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar and crew, thought to be sheltering in Pakistan, as well and the militant Haqqani tribe, which straddles Afghanistan and the Pakistani territory of Northern Waziristan. Mullen said Kayani “gets” that too.

“He is very aware of the additional insurgents that are out there, and he is likewise focused in getting at them,” Mullen said. “I say that broadly. That’s without exactly how that’s going to be done or when that’s going to be done.”

And that sounds to this reporter like two military commanders getting together and saying to each other, we know what needs to happen, and we also know how fast the politicians want it to happen. But we also both know that from a military standpoint, it doesn’t happen that fast on the ground.

Call it a diplomatic version of “back off, and let us do our job.” But you won’t hear a general, or an admiral, saying that to a reporter out loud.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress